# Plantagenet

Your following character assassination of myself - which has nothing to do with the message delivered in my article - is despicable and cannot be left unanswered.

“David has thrown his finely honed legal brain out the window.

He believes Trump - so lack of Evidence doesn't count.

David is better placed than American Courts to consider American matters - it seems.”

My “finely honed legal brain” was pointing out two inescapable facts:
1. that there were two petitions filed in the Supreme Court with requests their hearing be expedited and judgements be delivered before 6 January - to neither of which Petitions the Supreme Court had responded.

2. That such failure by the Supreme Court to respond would abandon Congress and the American people to settle their election differences on 6 January without the benefit of a ruling by the Supreme Court as to whether only State legislatures could change voting rules and procedures under the US Constitution.

The failure of the Supreme Court to so act led to the incredibly disturbing and violent scenes on 6 January that can never be justified or condoned - no matter how great the frustration or feeling of aggrievement.

The Court will probably now say that the two Petitions are moot because the election has been decided.

If that was the Court’s strategy - it has come at a terrible cost to the rule of law and the expectation that the law is democracy’s answer to settling disputes between people with claimed grievances.

When SCOTUS was most needed - it went missing in action.

Spend your time addressing this message Plantagenet rather than shooting the messenger who has delivered it to you.

To David Singer- Thanks for your article.

I can't claim to have an in depth knowledge of issues here but I believe I have am a stakeholder- though Australian issues have more relevance.

Being a lawyer you have a vested interest in the rule of law. At some stage the rule of law will break down if it is no longer seen as serving the interest of "the people". Then there will be chaos- but sometimes a period of relative chaos is required for a reset- hopefully no one dies.

For the globalists it's not a matter of truth it's a matter of winning of power- there are many globalist capitalists on the side of BLM/ antifa/ etc.

In war truth no longer matters- any personal truth you raised will be destroyed by the enemy- and will advertise your location- hurt you- all you can do is pick a side and pray that your side wins- slowly win hearts and minds.

This ideological war reminds me of the English Civil War- Father against Son. Fragile shifting alliances, fear.

You've raised two good points- to be fair to SCOTUS they need to be careful of questioning state juresdiction without a sufficiently good reason. Over time perhaps we will have a better view of this emerging situation. Or maybe a powerful few will bury it so deep we never find the truth.

Courts avoid making decisions to avoid risk and leave parties to fight beyond what is reasonable- the court wants to see both parties losing something- part of "justice being seen to be done".

It almost seems that the globalists on the left and right have executed a coup d'état of the US- SCOTUS perhaps realised that this is the new reality- and that they can't really do anything about it- perhaps the legal community itself has been subverted by special interests- and become divided from the interests of the US people/ declaration.

The giant US- brought down by a hundred foreign attacks- a thousand flee bites- within/ without- it's British American people becoming prisoners of glass.

God help America!

I regret having read David Singer's article.

David Singer,
Firstly, are you seriously claiming the people would have acted differently if the SCOTUS had heard the cases?

Secondly, I see you've still failed to answer my earlier question: have you any actual evidence the states weren't complying with their electoral legislation?

Thirdly, if indeed the states have breached their own electoral legislation, how can you fail to recognise that justice demands the votes be valid by estoppel?

______________________________________________________________________________

JBowyer,
I see you're engaging in a bit of whataboutery! You seem to have failed to notice the simplest explanation for their lack of interest in the Hunter Biden Laptop from the media and indeed the FBI: it was a fake!

Are there genuine suspicions that Antifa were in the White House? Or is just believers of Trump's lies blindly assuming Trump supporters don't do that sort of thing so it must be Antifa despite these actions running contrary to Antifa's usual MO?

As for VicPol, I haven't a clue what they're doing. Living west of the border I don't take much of an interest.