Its too late, it should have been started in the 1960s and 1970s. You really are ignorant, elitists woke plonkers. In the 1970's the green meanies and the Sierra Club, C of Rome were forecasting ice ages, acid rain and nuclear winters withy the 20th century.

Time you guys moved on and like A Cortez stopped living in you ego induced land of lollipops and rainbows, where the 'dream time' fantasy world has addled what little grey matter you ever had.

Hippo weekend and go do something productive on a bootiful sunny spring weekend, you plonkers!

My, my, the denial of reality is staggering!

Higher CO2 atmospheric concentration equals higher temperatures.
Higher temperatures equals higher water vapour atmospheric concentrations.
Higher water vapour atmospheric concentrations equals higher temperatures.
Higher temperatures equals higher water evaporation rates from the environment.
Higher evaporation rates from the environment means even higher water vapour atmospheric concentration and equals higher temperatures and equals loss of available water in dams, rivers, lakes, farm dams, soils and forests, and so equals loss in the environment overall.
Higher temperatures and higher evaporation rates equals drier flora, drier ground-cover, increased leaf-fall from trees, shrubs and vines, and so equals greater fire risk and produces greater fire intensities.

The solution to increasing atmospheric CO2 levels is to increase plant-life ground-cover by improved environmental management including by enhanced freshwater-usage, enhanced agriculture and forest and environmental restoration and rehabilitation, more and bigger dams and lakes and secure water-course management and usage.

These measures will reduce atmospheric CO2 and water vapour concentrations, and thereby reverse temperature increase in the environment and the resultant attendant hazards - including fire risk.

Problem solved; argument ended; mania averted.

"my dog, the neighbour's cat, the chimpanzee, and Tony Abbott and Barnaby Joyce". all know the climate is changing, Mr O

Yes true, but unlike those with an arts education, they are smart enough to know it is not caused by CO2.

Succinctly put Hasbeen, as ever. But when religions and cuts are driving belief, this plonkers just can't see it..

One day their grand kids will say , NOT

"Thank you Grandpapi for your fight against C02" and

instead say,

"what drugs were your on... none?... you guys were plonkers!"

Alison Jane / Hasbeen,

The world scientific community and the world's leading politicians and an increasing number of transnational corporations now recognise that adverse climate change is being caused by anthropogenic global warming produced by the burning of fossil fuels.

AGW / climate deniers like you two with your refusal to accept the truth are now being looked upon increasingly as a cancer to life on Earth.

I personally see you deniers as being comparable to the Holocaust deniers who refuse to accept that the Holocaust ever took place.

Any one who needs to rely on politicians and "leading scientists" who are defined by the money they get from politicians…. you need a mirror mate and some time to think.

Enjoy the weekend and the wonderful world we live in, rather that follow the dogmatic cult of CCC/KKK.