shadowminister,

No, you used abusive language toward Greta Thumberg by calling her a retard.

I quite clinically returned the favour.

Why are you saying I started it when that is patently untrue.

You dished it out and I returned it in equal measure. Why do you think that is in anyway unfair?

This is the way bullies react when it comes back at them.

Suck it up you sook.

SR

Now you are just lying to cover up your sociopathic tendencies.

As pointed out before I never used the epithet "retard" (an insult derived from the adjective retarded) and your abuse was not only entirely unwarranted but extreme.

As I pointed out in any exchange between us you as far as I can remember you are always the first to sling abuse. On this site, you are cantankerous, abusive and vulgar.

SteeleRedux,

I think the shadyminister has it in for Greta Thunberg in much the same way that the English had it in for Joan of Arc.

If the AGW / climate denialists ever got to strap Greta to the stake I'm sure the shadyminister would be at the head of the line ready to toss a torch onto the pyre.

I can just see the shadyminister watching the flames leap up towards Greta as he screams 'Burn you AGW witch!"

Swamp donkey,

Are you off your meds?

shadyminister,

You've gone and done it again you quick witted bastard you!

What's your secret shady?

If you could bottle it you would be a millionaire!

Shadowminister,

More slippery than a butcher's dick mate. This was the definition you paraphrased without including the 'offensive' preface.

“ADJECTIVE dated, offensive Less advanced in mental, physical, or social development than is usual for one's age.”

You were the one who started slagging off in this thread up to which our exchange had been cordial.

I think you will find you have been purposefully offensive in many threads before I have bitten back. If there is an example where this hasn't been the case then I would ike to hear it.