Hey Ken,

Too much value on democracy and not enough value in national identity.

You can't support a position against racism and another against globalism at the same time.
I think your talking out of both sides of your mouth.

You want to keep democracy, (form of government used to rob a nations people of their national assets) but remove the national identity aspect.

Why?
Because there's no such thing as democracy in a 2 party system where one party is an 'immigrant platform'. (Labor)
In this scenario we don't have 'democracy' or more to the point 'national democracy'.
What we have is 'international democracy (courtesy of the UN) imposed upon nation states'
You want to keep the system of government in place, but remove any form of ethic patriotism that it was built upon.

It's time academics faced up to this truth.

When you promote a war on racism, what you're actually doing is promoting a war on national identity, because national identity and the right to self-determination relates directly to ethnicity.

All you're actually doing is stealing every single nation from the citizens whom they belong to and making the entire worlds western citizens global tenants in their own countries, subservient to unelected faceless global bureaucrats and laws and decisions that were never voted on by the people themselves.

Academics are too scared to raise any issue that might be considered controversial because you might get blacklisted or sidelined in a globalist world, which means your hands are tied and that you're not even capable of facing up to the real global issues in the first place.

"Chinese leaders, after asserting ‘We condemn this despicable practice’, proceeded to sow doubt about the origin of the virus and even claim it was introduced to China by American soldiers on exercise there."

It was.
How can you write this article, but be clueless about things you've referenced?
http://youtu.be/O26Lsxs6USI

I'm not sure you're fit to discuss the topics of racism, globalism or COVID-19.
Academics are often clueless narrow minded fools that can't see the trees for the leaves.
- Paid propagandists.

Armchair Critic,

Like ttbn, you have just shown yourself to be just another member of The Forum's Old Farts Club who knows absolutely nothing about the Arts things like history, sociology, anthropology, archaeology, philosophy, etc.

Nowhere has the words racism, sexism, Nazis, homophobes been so devalued as those of the globalist mentality. Globalism failed with the tower of babel, failed with the UN and will totally fail under the likes of Bill Gates and other heralded individuals. Read the end up the book.

Mr Opinion,

What you think about what I think about anything adds nothing useful. Are you now another sock puppet for SteeleRedux?

ttbn,

What I have said above has nothing to do with what I think and all to do with what I know.

Wrong Armchair Critic, it is the academics who are the problem, with their attitude that other academics world wide are their fellows, & no affinity to the poor bloody taxpayer in their own countries who pay through the nose to be denigrated by them, while keeping them in comfort.

When we finally junk the ABC we should simultaneously sack every academic who has ever been on one of their programs. Two useless, bludging birds with the stone.