Typical of a coal enthusiast and climate change denier?

Needed to use some nondescript summation of California bush fires because he could find something there from a fellow traveller or two? To support his garbage in garbage out analysis.

Yes Genius, the climate changes with the waxing and waning of the sun! And it would seem to change around every 200 years with a change to the magnetic field, i.e. north-south reversal?

And in the waxing phase, there seems to be more activity and greater solar thermal heat hitting our planet, one of three in the habitable zone, the other two Mars and Venus. Venus being the hottest planet in the solar system with a moisture-laden CO2 atmosphere! Has a heavier atmosphere due to the fact its former oceans etc are now part of the heat-trapping CO and sulphur laden atmosphere and a surface hot enough to melt the rubber on our boot soles.

Conversely, during the normal cyclical waning phase, as we've been in since the mid-seventies. (NASA) Planet earth traditionally cools with advancing ice, etc!

Not what we have now and a plain as the nose on your face except for the coal addicted far-right who see their particular gravy train rumble to a halt and them holding a product we won't be able to give away soon, Genius!

With the designed and programmed (demented) destruction of our manufacturing sector, via moribund government policy, we are made for too reliant on seasonal tourism and foreign student for our export income and domestic economy.

Thereby forcing up the price of real estate with unprecedented demand!

And this terribly fragile service industry damaged to the point of non-recovery by the unimaginable forest fires and now this killer virus!

And all down to administrations where the inmates have taken over and are running the asylum?

Hence garbage like this seeing the light of day and our once substantial manufacturing sector, lying in virtual ruins around our ankles, like a badly stained and shredded jockstrap!

A manufacturing-based and supported economy isn't hurt much by either event, Genius! TBC.
Alan B.

I am really getting jack of those who will not have a bar of any notion of AGW then posting 'evidence' which directly includes references to it;

During the 2017-19 fires in California, AGW believers and its Hollywood luvies slammed the fires on climate change. However, the experts who reviewed them say "20% to 25% of the wildfire damage resulted from climate change, and "75% is the way we manage lands and develop our landscape".

So does the author accept a the role of human emissions in global warming or not. If he doesn't then he should save us from quotes that do.

Consistency is a marvelous thing in sustaining and argument.

I just saw on ABC News that Australia's scientists are writing a letter to Australia's politicians asking them to take action on climate change.

I wonder if Hasbeen, individual, mhaze, Loudmouth, Bazz, Josephus, and all of those other AGW / climate change deniers will counter this by writing a letter from their group to Australia's politicians asking them NOT to take action on climate change.

Mr Opinion

you get soothsayers mixed up with real scientist.

runner,

It was on the news. So I don't get your point.

Will you be rounding up your AGW / CC deniers to put together a letter to Australia's politicians asking them NOT to take action on climate change.

You won't have much trouble on getting Soot 'Beam up me Scotty' Morrison on board. He seems to want to be in anything where he doesn't have to do anything.

Mr Opinion, totally off topic query, but what's all this "Beam me Scotty" stuff about, are you a Trekkie? Why not focus on the topic, as opposed to your hatred of SCOMO, namely AGW attempts to blame bushfires on climate change over fuel load?

Have you read any of the last centuries reports on bushfires?

Just read one, the 2009 Victorian fire inquiry! Sobering thoughts for ardent AGW'ers and CCC'ers

As for steelredux, any excuse to not read anything that doesn't fit your elite view of the world!