The Forum > Article Comments > Australia’s Liberal Party no longer ‘liberal’ > Comments
Australia’s Liberal Party no longer ‘liberal’ : Comments
By Tristan Ewins, published 16/10/2019John Stuart Mill would turn in his grave if he was aware of Liberal policies on trade unions, charities, ........
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Page 4
- 5
- 6
-
- All
A little while back Belly started a thread about socialism. When I asked him and others what their definition was, no one ventured an answer. Belly thought the question was tantamount to a personal attack!!
Socialism is one of those terms that has lost all mean...if it ever had a meaning. Ask 10 people and you'll get 11 definitions.
I know what the term means to me, but it needs to be defined each time its used otherwise everyone talks at cross purposes.
My definition is that socialism is communism-lite. Whereas communism requires that the means of production be owned by the people (ie the state), socialism requires that the means of production be controlled by the state. Communism = dictatorship. Socialism might allow democracy but always fails that aim in the real world.
The ramifications of socialism are different to its aims. Inevitably, in so far as it has happened every time to date, socialism spirals into violence, dictatorship, want and massive inequality. Its not the aim of the ideology but the result.
Another trait of socialism is that while such states are arguably successful, socialists happily call said state socialist. As soon as it it spirals out of control, they suddenly decide its never really was socialist eg Venezuela.