Bazz

I did see a report somewhere that backs up what you are saying, there are quite a
big percentage of Pakistanis ( can’t remember the number exactly) could have been 27% but not sure now.

But it was stated that when these people are let into a Western countries they find it hard to get jobs because their IQ is around 70%.
Apparently,even our army won’t take people with an IQ, that low, because they can’t train them or work with them.

The average intelligence of the Western Races is 100% and the Asians and Chinese,Japanese are around 120%.
People with 70% IQ and it’s not all, will never be able to adapt well or hold down jobs in our fast paced educated societies.
Instead of it being politically incorrect to discuss IQ based on races that marry cousins or just have damaged intelligence,
through being undernourished all their lives, it should be talked about in the interests of wanting the best for our countries future and prosperity.

Cherful,

Using IQ by country we find that...

New Zealand is at 18th while Australia is only 25th and the US is 27th.

Pakistan is 75th but well ahead of South Africa at 95 or Saudi Arabia at 82.

The top smartest 6 countries in the world include China, Singapore and Hong Kong;in fact all Asians.

So what point is there in trying to use IQ as some kind of measure?

To Alon Ben-Meir.

Does it strike you as odd that the very people who hate the United States's use of military and it's size of military, are also the first ones to sound the alarm at the US announcing a withdrawal of it's troops.

Honestly my figurings based on Trump's actions so far domestically and abroad is that he is willing to cause smoke and fire in order to entice the people effected to consider making a deal in one way or another. In other words give them reason to sweat. In this case the security risk in Syria is pitted against the American people's drive to bring back more of their troops out of harm's way. The American people are sacrificing enough sending their troops for extended periods of service with more then enough risk of several of them not returning. What's in it for the sacrifice? To be the lifelong militarized police in explosive reasons that don't want you there to begin with? Withdrawal should always be on the table for any foreign military assisting in international affairs.

By Trump even suggesting to withdraw is at start: a fire set under the pants of those who's interests are protected by the US's military presence. Based on Trump's actions with North Korea, this is not a new move in international affairs. Tell them what your going to do, and see if the other guys have anything more to offer then complain. If after that Trump backs down from bringing troops home, that could be a direct result of other nations making it worth America's sacrifice to stay there and take the role of being a cop to terrorizing governments bent on each other's destruction. Honestly I hope the troops are able to come home. The region is already unstable. Time enough for other nations to help also, or for long term solutions to be offered and not have to rely on forced peace through international military presence.

Chereful; The custom of cousin marriage has been going on so long
in the ME that the damage is throughout the whole Arab community.
Luckily many are affected only marginally, but some have physical
defects instead. It is all up to chance just depending on how the
chromosomes merge at conception.
It is surprising that in tribes of horse and camel breeders such a
custom could survive.
One of the Hadiths tells the story that a man asked Mohammad if it
was OK to marry his cousin. Mohammad replied that he would ask Gabriel
when he next saw him to ask Allah.
Gabriel dutifily did so and came back with the message that yes it is
OK to marry your cousin.
That story could be the source of their troubles.

Re the 70%, I read that was the ratio of cousin marriage in Pakistan.
Was it so before India split, and is it a custom in India or just
restricted to Muslims.

Hey Not_Now.Soon,

I'd be willing to bet the US won't give up the Al-Tanf base or the Oilfields.

http://foreignpolicy.com/2019/10/21/kurdish-oil-fields-syria-us-trump/

http://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2019/03/08/syria-accuses-us-stole-40-tons-of-its-gold/

If you want to understand what goes on behind the scenes watch this:
October 12th, 2019 Fiona Hill, Crowdstrike, Zelensky, Deripaska, and Chalupa
http://youtu.be/I6r9O1De8cE

Then go watch the other shorter videos I posted here:
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=20551&page=0#362393

Apart from the neocon agenda, it's all just wars for profit.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-10-22/donald-trump-kurds-some-us-soldiers-may-stay-syria-oilfields/11625522

"We want to keep the oil, and we'll work something out with the Kurds so they have some money … maybe we'll get one of our big oil companies to go in and do it properly."