Banjo,

my response to #1, was more a metaphor.
My point is that people are still conducting themselves like apes, in this day and age.
They certainly don't look like apes, well not all of them.
#2. I have no idea why you are submitting these factors in what is a straight forward fact of nature.
This fact is not open to speculation and question or even consideration.
The male IS the dominant of the species, and this is not in doubt.
#3.You appear to have intentionally mis-represented this one.
You cannot sit there and promote the mistakes of things like queers and dwarfs.
You must not suggest that these two types of humans are the "norm".
They usually use words like "this a normal, healthy baby".
That is not the case when some thing other than normal or healthy is discovered, so even though the creation of this baby was down to nature, so was it's faults and flaws.
You can call it the relay of life but I choose to call it what has been referred to the beginning of life.
And don't play the superior card with me, you know very well I mean the beginning of THIS particular life.
So as you can see this is what I refer to 'out of step with nature by birth'.
Where-as when I say by 'choice', is simply one choosing to be treated as something they are clearly not.
I do not subscribe to the ridiculous notion that someone simply decides to be something other than what nature created, is many things and they are all bad, save me having to waste time typing them all.
And so it is that nature screwed up, something went awry in the development of the egg, and so we end up with these imperfect examples of homo-sepian.

continued.................

Thereby rendering them as, irrelevant.
When I say, "by birth", I am describing any living thing that does not conform to the specifications as laid down by the norms of nature of the day.
Why do you think doctors do a thorough examination of the new-born baby, and if they discover anything, ANYTHING, out of the norm, they immediately perform the necessary proto-col to confirm what is wrong, and to what extent.
They usually say, 'this is a normal healthy baby', if nothing is wrong or out of the ordinary.
Where-as they won't say that if there is something wrong or out of the ordinary.
Your refusal to accept there are flawed creations in the world is on you.
Because you refuse to see that these broken life forms are in fact failures of nature, and you promote them or do not acknowledge that they are not, true and complete examples of homo-sapiens, according to NATURE, then it is you who are out of step with nature by your complicity.
And so it is that mutations like queers and dwarfs are not the norms of nature, but the misfits or MISTAKES of nature!
You do know that such things existed didn't you?