The Forum > Article Comments > Reading manifestos: restricting Brenton Tarrant’s The Great Replacement > Comments
Reading manifestos: restricting Brenton Tarrant’s The Great Replacement : Comments
By Binoy Kampmark, published 21/3/2019Removing the manifesto does a disservice to any arguments that might be mounted against him, but having a debate is not what this is generally about.
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
- 2
-
- All
What a profound appraisal by Binoy of the concept of thought control!
One's thinking and attitude is determined by awareness of as many differing propositions as possible, a factor in reasoned debating of an issue.
A nuanced effect of any form of externally imposed censorship is the self-censoring of ideas which flow after one's exposure to a range of arguments - this is normal and natural but needs to be realised as part of personal bias.
This is a reason why it is difficult for journalists to achieve balance in their reporting of any contentious matter; they should try to report facts, not impressions.
Truth is best realised by those who are fortunate to have been educated in the skills of scepticism and the appreciation of the effect of each word or deed upon another fellow being.
Censorship is a fall-back for individual lack of awareness