Leo

If people read or watch the references that I have supplied they will see where the fraud is coming from. I have given examples of where it has occurred.
All you have done is added abuse which is a red flag to show you have nothing to offer.
You produced a nonsense fake reference to try and back your ideological stance.

Well written Leo Lane.

Your premise, that alarmists only present statistics that the globe is apparently warming (according to themselves), they never submit any evidence that this supposed warming is the result of human activity.

Interesting point. I will have to add that premise to my armoury. Thank you.

Lego/Leo

You might like to provide details as to how Earth has been warmed.
Detailed references would be necessary to show how you derived your opinion.
Nothing to back up comments equals a non-scientific opinion.

The flea has found another climate liar in Thomas Stocker. As usual, the flea has no science to show any measurable human effect on climate. It is not disputed that there is a human effect, but to have it recognised, it must be measured, something that the fraud backers cannot do, so, like the flea, they simply lie about it. The flea refers to my truthful accounts of his nonsense as “abuse”
"Hilary Ostrov has a post with a video of Thomas Stocker, the co-chair of the IPCC WG1, speaking at the launch of AR5 WG1 in Stockholm at the end of September.
After an introduction, the first graph Stocker shows is the decadally averaged, ‘hide the decline’ graph, the lower half of Fig SPM 1a, that I discussed in an earlier post.
He spends about two minutes on the graph, from about 07:45 to 09:45. At no point in his presentation does he show the actual annual temperature graph (the upper half of Fig 1a), which of course would have shown the levelling out in the last decade."
https://ipccreport.wordpress.com/2013/11/04/thomas-stocker-tries-to-hide-the-decline/

To Ant.

The Earth has warmed and cooled five times since 300BC. We are now in another warming period. Whether we have peaked and are now cooling, or will continue to warm, nobody can say.

If climate alarmists, who are taking what is simply natural climate variability and turning it into a ideological mission to destroy capitalism, claim that humans are the cause of the present warming period, then the onus is upon the alarmists to prove it.

This they can not do. The latest dishonest tactic by the alarmists, is to pretend that the science is universally accepted and to keep the lie alive by always referring to it as an indisputable fact. That, and keep tossing lawsuits at anybody who upsets their trillion dollar gravy train.

Legal score so far.

Climate deniers 2
Climate alarmists 0

Dear LEGO,

And the world has not seen atmospheric CO2 levels this high in over 3 million bloody years.

What laws of physics do you want me to ignore to enable me accepting that this is not causing global warming?

Pretty easy question. The other is what would it take for you to believe in the science of global warming. What would need to be laid in front of you before you could accept you were wrong?

Simple enough I would have thought.