As the flea well knows,Carter pointed out the attempts to disrupt the work of honest scientists, who showed that warming was natural and the argument for human causation was invalid.The climate gate emails show the attempts of the fraud promoters, like Jones, and Mann to derail the valid science
http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/.
The peer reviewed paper by Mclean, deFreitas and Carter showed “ENSO variation accounts for a very large portion of the variability in global temperature, thus leaving little room for a substantial human influence on temperature.”
https://quadrant.org.au/opinion/doomed-planet/2010/03/bob-carter-john-mclean/

There is no science to show any measurable human causation in global warming.

I'll see your Potholer 54 Mr Ant, and raise you..

Youtube. Debunking The Debunker

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9XIpTqbLR5Y&feature=youtu.be

mhaze,
'Tis unclear from reading the thread, so again I ask you:
exactly what quote are you accusing (or "proving") ant of doctoring?

Re glyphosate, it's not a case of ignoring the science, but of distrusting some studies because of potential bias. Under these conditions, I'd also be suspicious of metaanalyses. The appropriate thing to look at would be glyphosate exposure in NH Lymphoma patients compared to in the general population.

____________________________________________________________________________________

Luciferase,
I agree banning glyphosate would be ridiculous - indeed I mentioned that it's still much safer than other herbicides. But that doesn't mean we should turn a blind eye to the risks - doing so results in safety precautions being ignored, exacerbating the problem.

The climate fraud promoters spread the lie that 97% of climate scientists support the fraud promoter’s lie about human causation:”Here is Cook’s summary of his paper: “Cook et al. (2013) found that over 97 percent [of papers he surveyed] endorsed the view that the Earth is warming up and human emissions of greenhouse gases are the main cause.”
This is a fairly clear statement—97 percent of the papers surveyed endorsed the view that man-made greenhouse gases were the main cause—main in common usage meaning more than 50 percent.
But even a quick scan of the paper reveals that this is not the case. Cook is able to demonstrate only that a relative handful endorse “the view that the Earth is warming up and human emissions of greenhouse gases are the main cause.” Cook calls this “explicit endorsement with quantification” (quantification meaning 50 percent or more). The problem is, only a small percentage of the papers fall into this category; Cook does not say what percentage, but when the study was publicly challenged by economist David Friedman, one observer calculated that only 1.6 percent explicitly stated that man-made greenhouse gases caused at least 50 percent of global warming.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexepstein/2015/01/06/97-of-climate-scientists-agree-is-100-wrong/#67993c803f9f
The flea supports the climate fraud, with no science to support his position. which rests on dishonesty and fraud

Lawrence Journal-World. Sunday, March 11, 1979.

The Globe Is Cooling.

"One thing is indisputable, the world has been cooling off since WW2, something like 1 degree Fahrenheit. But that might be just a temporary swing in the climate. Dr J. Murray Mitchell, of the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration, says that the world has been cooling off in the long run. On average, it has cooled down by something like 1 degree Fahrenheit or half a degee Celsius, and that cooling began about WW2."

The Canberra Times Glaciers Grow in Norway. July 18, 1963. AAP Reuter.

Norways glaciers are in the process of becoming thicker again after 200 years of gradually melting down, according to Glaciologist Oleg Liestol.

New York Times Thursday, January 5, 1978.

International Team of Specialists Finds No End in Sight to 30 Year Cooling Trend in Northern Hemisphere.

CIA report. OPR-401 August 1974.

There is, moreover, a consensus among climate scientists that the Earth is undergoing a cooling trend.

Geology Professor Emeritus Don Easterbrook. submission to Washington State Senate Committee on Climate Change.

"There was a period of cooling from 1880 to 1915, from 1915 to 1945 the climate warmed, and then it cooled again from 1945 to 1977. Then it warmed again from 1977 to 1999. And since 1999 it has cooled again, not a lot, but slightly."