Dear Leo Lane,

Mate.

We used to debate this topic years ago and although you were a strange bird even back then at least you would try and debate the topic on halfway normative grounds, you know, ones which don't involve going off like some madrass nutter in virtually incoherent babble speak.

Are you travelling okay at the moment? Or is it the result of being in the 'trenches' for too long. It might be time to have a break and get yourself tracking straight.

Leo

If I wished to provide an example of somebody using psychological projection, you provide the obvious example.
Science is about evidence based comment.
Not sophist gibberish.
Your references please.

Tony. Ant and Steeleredux et al.
You are all wasting your time trying to beat knowledge into the heads of people with cast iron brains. They belong to an unfortunately large cohort which asserts that belief supplants evidence and the more evidence you give them, the stronger become their beliefs. Religious nutters and conspiracy theorists also fall into the same category. They do not understand the principles of reasoned argument nor will they ever. They are to be pitied, but most importantly, ignored. This is barren ground, you cannot expect the good seeds to grow in the ordure which is oozing therefrom.
David

Thank you, David. You are right about entrenched views. I respond on the basis of providing information to people who read articles here on a casual basis. In other words knocking out the strawman garbage put out by Leo et al.

Toni Lavis has called me a liar and a fraud. He has shown how he gained the mis- apprehension that I was a liar, because I carelessly dismissed the flea’s claim as I routinely do his monotonous lies. Tony’s pea brain did the rest.Knowing nothing about the situation, he drew wrong conclusions and made a fool of himself, telling baseless lies about me..
Toni Lavis, of course had to tell us, some time back, on another thread, that despite having a woman’s name, he is, in fact, male.
He never explained his obsession with female sexual perversion, but I will ask why, without basis, he has called me a fraud. Why did he tell this gratuitous lie?
Are you a habitual liar, Tony, or is this a single instance? Do you claim to be truthful, Tony, despite this blatant lapse? In any case it demonstrates your severe mental limitations. You have enough problems, don’t you, Tony, with your disgusting obsession wit female sexual perversion.

Leo

I believe Graham should delete your last comments about Toni. They only below in in the gutter, no professional journal would allow such personal attacks.