It appears that the flea has given up his activity as a pest.
His lack of education even surprised him, particularly when he realised that water vapour is an important greenhouse gas.
His reaction was to post material from the internet to pretend that he had been aware of it, but it was another reminder of his lack of education.
It is nice to see the back of him.

Leo

When you begin answering questions I ask, then you you can expect answers from me. I have asked for references to support your opinion; you clearly are not able to do so.

You clearly have not watched the series of lectures referred previously, and ask a very facile question. It is very clear you have not understood my analogy of a healthy person injecting a few units of insulin .. death would be the result.

Rather than sophistry and extreme abuse, please provide references.

http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/

Quote:

Statement on climate change from 18 scientific associations

"Observations throughout the world make it clear that climate change is occurring, and rigorous scientific research demonstrates that the greenhouse gases emitted by human activities are the primary driver." (2009)2

You write garbage Leo.
References please.

The flea is back again, and says:” When you begin answering questions I ask, then you you can expect answers from me. I have asked for references to support your opinion;
This is further proof of the flea’s inability to think straight.
He supports an assertionof human caused global warming, but has no science to show any measurable human effect on climate.
He has now put forward a statement which he says was made by “18 scientific associations”. He is unable to give any link to this asserted statement.
He also commits the logical fallacy of requesting that I prove a negative, because he has no proof of the asserted science upon which he relies, because there is no such science.

“Demanding that one proves the non-existence of something in place of providing adequate evidence for the existence of that something. Although it may be possible to prove non-existence in special situations, such as showing that a container does not contain certain items, one cannot prove universal or absolute non-existence. The proof of existence must come from those who make the claims.”
Accused of a fallacy? Suspect a fallacy? Ask Dr. Bo and the community
There are difficulties in dealing with an uneducated ill mannered person who insists on participating beyond his abilities. Why did you come back, flea? It must be obvious to you that you are attempting to participate in a situation beyond your capacity.
Where is the reference to science which shows any human effect on climate?.
It does not exist and your request that I prove its non existence, is just another manifestation of your uneducated, ill-mannered nonsense.

//He has now put forward a statement which he says was made by “18 scientific associations”. He is unable to give any link to this asserted statement.//

He did that in his last post. But here is it again, because apparently you don't read so good or something.

http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/

Thanks, Toni. He has found some lies printed by NASA, but they do not go so far as to say that human emissions affect the climate, just the unscientific, and baseless assertion of the mendacious IPCC, that it is “highly likely”.I Know you were trying to help,Toni, but what I said was correct. There was no linkto any science, because there is no such science. The flea just likes to waste my time. Please mind your own business, and do not help him.

//I Know you were trying to help,Toni, but what I said was correct. //

No, what you said was, and I quote:

"He is unable to give any link to this asserted statement."

But he was. I know he was, because I copy+pasted his link into my post. You are a liar and a fraud, sir... not to mention a frightfully rude fellow.