The Forum > Article Comments > The role of immigration in Australia's population future > Comments
The role of immigration in Australia's population future : Comments
By Philip Ruddock, published 15/10/2001Philip Ruddock argues that Australia needs more skilled migrants to acheive our optimum population
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
-
- All
Posted by blogggit, Monday, 21 August 2006 1:10:17 AM
| |
I would like to finish posting this newspaper article but this computer will not take the data so I will try and post the rest later but in the meantime.
Philip Ruddock gazetted regulations when he was Australias immigration minister[number S241 of 1997] to stop visitors from many countries coming to Australia and among them is Poland.[Israel is also on the list as well as the following countries-Bangladesh, Burma, Cambodia, Chile, China, Colombia, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Egypt, Fiji, Greece, Hungary, India, Iran, Jordan, Lebanon, Macedonia, Mauritius, Nauru, Pakistan, Peru, Philippines, Portugal, Romania, Samoa, Slovakia, Sri Lanka, Syria, Tonga, Turkey, Ukraine, Uruguay, Vanuatu, Vietnam and Yugoslavia]. More at http://nowhiteaustralia.blogspot.com/ And http://www.country-liberal-party.com/pages/Let-Them-Drown.html And http://www.country-liberal-party.com/pages/LetThemLand.htm And http://www.country-liberal-party.com/pages/Child-abuse.htm Posted by blogggit, Monday, 21 August 2006 4:46:47 PM
|
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
-
- All
The following is an article from the "Sydney Morning Herald"September, 17th, 1996.
PART-1
"MIGRANT LAW MAY SEPARATE MARRIED COUPLES
The Government will cap and kill applications by Australians to bring their overseas spouses into Australia a move which would see long-term separations of married couples unless the Opposition allows through the Senate tough new measures to curb applications.
The Minister for Immigration, Mr Ruddock,said the draconian move,allowable under present law but never used in relation to spouses, would help curb huge increases in applications for spouses, some of which were shams, but others 'a fraud on Australians'.
Under present practise,applications for offshore spouses to come are allowed regardless of the quota set.Mr Ruddock wants to enforce his quota by a cap and queue regulation, making applicants after the qouta is reached to wait, possibly for months, until heading the queue for next years intake.
But in the face of Labor opposition in the Senate, he threatened to use his general cap and kill power to terminate applications made post-qouta.This would force Australians to apply again next year on equal terms with next year's applicants, causing indefinite separations.
Mr Ruddock's threat, which contradicts the Coalition's strong pro-family rhetoric but is part of a clampdown on migration numbers,was denounced by Labor's immigration spokeman, Mr Duncan Kerr, as social engineering.
The Opposition last week knocked off in the Senate one of several changes to regulations to tighten elegibility for 'preferential family' migration,available to spouses and aged parents.Mr Kerr told the Herald Labor would also disallow Mr Ruddock's 'cap and queue' regulation.
Mr Ruddock told the Herald that if people who had already applied were allowed in,the progam would overstep this year's 36,700 quota by about 13,000.Rather than allow an overshoot, he would use his general power under current law to cap and kill,unless Labor stopped trying to micro-manage his immigration program by disallowing regulations in the Senate.