dd,

They can't legislate away what people think. Alan B really should give up drinking.

Ttbn.

Politicians are going to take the brunt of homosexual obsessionalism.
This issue has panned out to be a national divider, as nothing else I've witnessed here.
It's obvious the divide is, as not uncommon, between city and the bush.

The bush is politically over-lorded by the National party.
For the coalition, it has been agonisingly destructive.
Turnbull will not lose any skin with his fancy city types. But the hatred of him in the bush is palpable.

Will this fracture the coalition?

The Nationals will be impossible to throw in the bush, but the Liberals are vulnerable in the city. Without the Nationals, Liberals are dead in the water.

But can they remain friends without losing support to whoever puts their hand up, as an alternative?

dd,

The Liberal party, in particular, has been fracturing since Marxist Malcolm knifed Abbott. The Nationals will endure because, as you say, they are not tainted by the urban Left. Good opportunities for the Australian Conservatives. One Nation is not well enough organised.

Ttbn

In terms of timing, I think it would be the ideal time for both Parties to throw-off the facade of friendship, and reorganise a credible opposition built on honesty towards the electorate.
A time to recognise the enemy, and go forward into the “no” electorates, preaching the return of power and sensibility, and promising a return of respect, to traditional moral values!

I think it is oversimplifying to believe "homosexualism" is entirely a Marxist front.
I think it is a good-part life style based on “urbane” fancies; read lifestyle of the rich and drug obsessed.

It has developed as an issue, since it is this group from which our politicians gravitate from, or longingly aspire to. The group to be sucked up to. Far distant from Marxism.

The tools of choice though, used by this manipulative collection of evil doers, are the teachers union. A mailable mix of aspirationals.

The universities, where the new age agitators and lay-abouts, pine for a power trip at another's expense, usually their parents, as a tradition.
Unmotivated and self absorbed, sexually deviant, and violent.
Nothing much changes.

And filtering down to the "stupid" of neurotic Women! Easily lied to and gullible.

I don't see an entire landscape of ideological Marxism. But Marxism carries with it the warriors of social destruction. Destruction of anything held dear and precious by the perceived enemy, those holding traditional values as worthy!

the ISIS look alike, Western style, are the nueva-homosexual: And not necessarily homosexual, but an elite, by invitation only club.

These are the enemy of truth, the enemy of sensibility, the enemy of the good and the decent among us, the enemy of Democracy as we have observed.

Alan B

Agreed, I'm just not as grumpy. It's nearly over and it's about time. Argument from tradition is nonsense, there are some very old traditions such as slavery which were abolished and civilisation survived.

The Four Horseman will have to wait.

Anyone heard from runner? U OK Bro?