//I do not agree.//

O.....kay

You asked me if I agreed, Dave. Remember?

//Do you agree Thobun was justified in quoting Balfour as he did?//

Agree: (verb) have the same opinion about something; concur.

But now you try to tell me that you never held that opinion in the first place? Dave, buddy... it's logically impossible for me to have agreed with you on something you never believed yourself... that's absurd.

So now that we've waded through the mire of your senility (again)... since you don't think whatshisface was justified in quoting Balfour in the manner that he did, your question should have been:

\\Do you agree that Thobun was not justified in quoting Balfour as he did?\\

Which is an entirely different question, and one that I frankly can't be buggered answering right now. If only you weren't so senile/crack-addled, these discussions would run so much smoother...

#Toni

You now state ever so "politely"
"So now that we've waded through the mire of your senility (again)... since you don't think whatshisface was justified in quoting Balfour in the manner that he did, your question should have been:

\\Do you agree that Thobun was not justified in quoting Balfour as he did?\\

Which is an entirely different question, and one that I frankly can't be buggered answering right now. If only you weren't so senile/crack-addled, these discussions would run so much smoother..."

Why don't you just answer "yes' or "no" to your own question - just one word - instead of writing another 30 or so words of hate-filled venom.

Why can't you be buggered answering "Yes" or "No" to your own question - but have the time to post ad hominem attacks calling me "senile" and "crack addled".

I can assure you that you are doing your reputation and credit no good carrying on in this fashion.

Just answer "Yes" or "No" to your own question please.

I direct the resident Zionist racist's attention to my footnote to an earlier post:

[1] See "Law of Return" which specifies in great detail who has the right genetic ancestry to become an Übermensch.

Read it with the shame that befits all racists. Here it is - the full self-admission in fine detail by Israel itself of its racist core.

Denial by our resident Zionist Über-racist is, in his own words, a waste of time.

Here's the shameful reference which I omitted from my post:

https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/the-law-of-return/

//Why don't you just answer "yes' or "no" to your own question - just one word - instead of writing another 30 or so words of hate-filled venom.//

Wouldn't be as much fun.

//I can assure you that you are doing your reputation and credit//

My reputation and credit? Exactly who do you imagine is reading this crap, Dave? The landed gentry and titled nobility?

Ain't nobody here but us chickens.

Reputation and credit of Balfour ? Most nations opposed his policy in Boer war.

"In 1901 a fifteen-page pamphlet reported on concentration camps operated by British Command in Boer war, and Lloyd George then openly accused the government of "a policy of extermination" directed against the Boer population. In June, 1901, Liberal party leader Campbell-Bannerman took up the assault and answered the rhetorical "When is a war not a war?" with "When it is carried on by methods of barbarism in South Africa," referring to those same camps and the policies that created them."
Balfour was Treasurer.

" Transvaal gold mines needed labour and recruited workers from China. Arthur Balfour gave approval in 1904, and had overall responsibility for the scheme . The so-called ‘coolies’ were to be indentured on a three-year contract, paid less than the blacks, and quarantined from the local population. "

The racial contempt for 700,000 Arabs is Mr Balfour's own work.