The Forum > Article Comments > The second person of the Trinity: the Son > Comments
The second person of the Trinity: the Son : Comments
By Peter Sellick, published 11/10/2017If a kindly Father God was looking down from above ready to intervene for his Son he must have turned aside so as not to see.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Page 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- ...
- 24
- 25
- 26
-
- All
I feel like you just say assertions to put the other person on the defense. Make them explain themselves when you've barely explained yourself, and sometimes even less explained your complaint.
1). What did I say that you count as untrue. (Don't be lazy. Actually say what your critizing.)
2). The sermon on the mount is a mixed bag? Go ahead, explain what you mean?
3). The bible is unreliable? Is this coming from you or from archeological finds that give credit to events within the bible? It's a nice assertion, but please give something to provide how either the bible failed you; it's teachings failed you, or in archeological finds it has been proven wrong. From where I stand it's very reliable.