The Forum > Article Comments > Health and well-being for the middle-aged? > Comments
Health and well-being for the middle-aged? : Comments
By Patricia Edgar, Don Edgar and Briony Dow, published 4/10/2017Urbanisation in under-developed countries has, in itself, improved the health and life expectancy of millions of people worldwide.
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
-
- All
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
-
- All
In fact, urbanisation seems to have an economic sweet spot at around thirty thousand souls? To thereafter, just become a place where the crime rate and mental health issues, accelerate exponentially faster than population growth?
Only in large urban areas is it possible to become invisible to the point of being dead two full weeks, so that the offensive smell coming from and elderly lady's bedsit, was all that alerted her URBAN neighbors of her demise.
As always, with a particular cohort of Architects and town planners/developers? They have a self serving vested interest in their opinions being seen as coherent erstwhile research?
Even so still just as valuable, as civic service, if applied to carbon reducing decentralisation and urban sanity!
As opposed to stack em and rack em, tinned people! And maximised profits for urban developers!?
And to hell with 2.5 times average city dweller carbon footprints, as the inevitable consequence of GRIDLOCK congestion/urban "renewal". When measured against country cousins?
The inmates now in charge of the asylum? Ratatattat! OMG! Fifty killed, hundreds wounded?
Ah yes, urban development/human herding and stressful crowding does seem to have "positive" health consequences, but only if measured against profit curves and bank balances?
Alan B.