The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Learning from the past and understanding the present > Comments

Learning from the past and understanding the present : Comments

By Sven Trenholm, published 26/9/2017

The balance of evidence from the strongest research, with large representative sampling, does not support same-sex parenting.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. Page 5
  7. All
//("how many grandmothers do you have?" asks the bursar)//

:)

If memory serves, Corporal "Nobby" Nobbs of the Ankh-Morpork City Watch is entitled to at least three 'Grandmother's funerals' per year.
Posted by Toni Lavis, Sunday, 1 October 2017 12:32:51 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Hi Toni,

I'm slow this morning, but was that an attempt at humour. Ho ho, I think.

But you make an interesting point: the self-indulgent classes will - as in China - have few or no children, and of course homosexual relationships support that trend, notwithstanding some token homosexuals demanding IVF because they love children so much. So, yes, each child will, in time, have many more grandparents than those grandparents have grandchildren.

Without being too apocalyptic about it, the logic of childless relations leads to an accelerating reduction in population from one generation to the next. Australia already has sub-ZPG, balanced only by a comparatively large migrant population. So we can already see a slowing-down, or halting, in the growth in the Australian-born population. Half of the population growth from one Census to the next is made up by migrants, from all over the world, around 200,000 per year, roughly balancing our annual birth-rate.

From one generation to the next, demographic change can be very rapid, and perhaps irreversible. Bernard Salt would have a much more informed contribution to make here. But the simple logic of childlessness, or one child families, is eventual (say, in two or three generations, population reduction
Without being too apocalyptic about it, the logic of childless relations leads to a reduction in population from one generation to the next. Australia already has sub-ZPG, balanced only by a comparatively large migrant population. So we can already see a slowing-down, or halting, in the growth in the Australian-born population. Half of the population growth from one Census to the next is made up by migrants, from all over the world, around 200,000 per year, roughly balancing our annual birth-rate.

From one generation to the next, demographic change can be very rapid, and perhaps irreversible. Bernard Salt would have a much more informed contribution to make here. But the simple logic of childlessness, or one child families, is eventual (say, in two or three generations) population reduction, perhaps catastrophically. We'll see with the disastrous Chinese experiment, by about 2050.

Cheers,

Joe
Posted by Loudmouth, Sunday, 1 October 2017 9:46:17 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. Page 5
  7. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy