The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Why won't women's advocates support banning the burka? > Comments

Why won't women's advocates support banning the burka? : Comments

By Brendan O'Reilly, published 7/9/2017

Islamic communities within suburbia in our major cities seem to have struck an alliance with Labor and the Greens.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Page 4
  6. 5
  7. All
Humans are predictable in the ways they act. All ethnic groups, even the Greeks when they first came out here would marry the young Greek girls off to old Greek men rather than have them marry an Australian. It keeps the genetics closer to the old cells.
The old cells the parents, are locked in a nature driven cycle of genetic survival. They prefer the genetics are as close as possible to the old,cells, the parents, who have to die.
It is our only genetic Immortality here on this earth. All ethnic groups try to do this in one way or another. The burqa is one way of doing this. Segregating the women off from the other ethnic group or bloodline. I keep saying to the academics, it is simple biology and the race for genetic survival that drives this behaviour at the instinctive human survival level.

But because they have their heads up in the human superiority, (in Gods image realm)they cannot bring themselves to acknowledge that mankind, like every other species on this planet, is actually
subject to the laws of nature, when it comes to genetic survival. Hence all the wars between races, races being those that are genetically closest to us, over territorial control.
Because our children need richly providing resources to see them prosper through the ages.
Hence all the wars over control of land and countries.
The covering of women by Muslim tribes especially when they move to areas where there are other
males of different, distant, genetics, is merely the parent, dying cells, keeping the new, children cells, genetically close. Kind of like the closest copy of the old cell, when it gets old and dies.

The academics refuse to see this, because they want to believe they, not nature is in control.
Posted by CHERFUL, Saturday, 9 September 2017 8:18:21 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Jealous insecure men is the reason for the full body cover, and snip the clit just t'be sure.
Posted by OutbackJack, Saturday, 9 September 2017 8:25:01 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Left wing Womens liberationists, can't condem the Burqa without admitting they
were wrong about multiculturalism and globalism.

So they prefer to ignore the contradiction between women's rights and the Muslim religion rather than renounce their ideological obsessions.
Posted by CHERFUL, Saturday, 9 September 2017 11:36:03 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Dog whistling to the racists and bigots again. And didn't they respond swiftly! Where's the campaign to ban full face motor bike helmets, balaclavas, masks, scarves...heck clothing full stop!

Banning things doesn't make them go away and I can get any number of banned items. There is also the issue that freedom of religion is enshrined in the constitution and any ban could be illegal.
Posted by minotaur, Monday, 11 September 2017 3:31:15 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
The feminists do not come out about moslem women because they are
more interested in being anti men.

Simple as that.
Posted by Bazz, Monday, 11 September 2017 7:15:30 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I admire and cherish liberal thoughts, but they have limits of application. And limits are different from culture to culture. If we do not consciously accept limits, we may be destroying liberalism.

Liberalism started, essentially, as a revolt to absolutitst political power, and we are uncounsciously apt to think that absolutist polical power is inimical and that liberal society can do without it and should ostracize it. But we cannot survive without absolutist power; democracy cannot exist nor survive without it.
In actuality democracy has inheritied it both in theory and practice from our preceding age or the age of Absolutist Monarchy when kings alone had absolutist power to exercise.
Democracy robbed them of it and has retained it ever since.

In Japan some of people's fundamental human rights are robbed or restricted. For instance, nobody is allowed to possess a gun except he/she is a policeman/woman no matter how you wished to have it like in America. Nobody is allowed to have more than a husband or wife at a time as in some countries; of course you can have as many mistresses or mistress-men if you wished.
In democratic Japan as in democratic Australia the parliament has the absolutist political power and it should have. For instance in Japan you must stop at a red traffic light no matter how you are allergic to the red colour; a few years ago the parliament passed a bill that raised the consumption tax from five to eight percent; it is absolutely binding no matter whether you are Japanese, Australian, Mexican.
Posted by Michi, Monday, 11 September 2017 9:09:28 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Page 4
  6. 5
  7. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy