The Forum > Article Comments > Why climate change agnosticism might be the better bet > Comments
Why climate change agnosticism might be the better bet : Comments
By Mark Manolopoulos, published 5/5/2017The most reasonable present position is to remain open-minded about climate change, particularly as the presently-framed debate distracts us from deeper issues.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Page 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
-
- All
The hyper-polluting system that gave rise to relevant debate on this thread article should be reconfigured to involve complete science and not just selected science to market alternative energy sales and profit.
Its way past deadline for action to stop or slow or reverse ocean ecosystem devastation including of the Great Barrier Reef.
Get over the CO2 nonsense, and that's what it is. Non sense.
Ocean currents, not CO2, regulate global climate.
Weather patterns are driven by ocean currents.
http://oceanexplorer.noaa.gov/facts/climate.html
I reiterate as I have said previously here on OLO.
AGW and Kyoto associated science did not measure and assess solar warmth absorbed and somewhat retained in historically unprecedented ocean and lake algae plant matter proliferated and increased in mass by historically unprecedented sewage and land use nutrient overload pollution.
How can climate change agnosticism be the better bet when there is dire urgent need to reduce the human source nutrient load dumped into ocean ecosystems daily? It is a worsening situation blatantly ignored in academic circles.
In the real world, algae is warming areas of ocean and lakes giving rise to increase in cloud and change in weather and climate regionally, but not globally all at the same time.
And academics hear this.
Seafood dependent island people are now suffering chronic and worsening hardship due to devastation of fish populations and small fish - food web nurseries, devastation due to numerous algae species reducing sunlight and photosynthesis.
The result is under nourished and starving tuna and other fish populations failing to breed and multiply successfully.
Whales and seabirds are starving.
Fish are not immune to starvation.
Overfishing has impact but is not the fundamental problem.
Consequences of CO2 agenda and failure to address ocean ecosystem damage and under-nutrition, include protein deficiency malnutrition and coinciding increase in maternal mortality, Diabetes II, major organ failure, overloaded health systems, civil unrest and threat to national and international security.
If academics need relevant data then go collect it.
Ignorance of the above situation is no excuse and may constitute crime against humanity and the environment