Yep, the concern is that some men will say they are female to get small business grants, pay less tax or maybe access to a education spot. And switch back to a man later on.

Lyle are the toilets at your house unisex?

P.S.
Just a little reminder most sexual assaults are done by family members or people they know.

Lyle is being optimistic in thinking the infestation of sexual-perversion in sporting organisations might be the “the final over-reach”. Nasty, determined minorities out are of control in Australia. While the rest of the West (except Canada) has had enough of being bullied by minorities, Australia seems to have lost all will to fight back. There is a lot worse to come, and Australians in general are too complacent to do much about it. There is a lot of whining, but little action.

There are still institutions left for the hard Left to march through.

When you look at France who is likely to select a man for President who was at very best solicited when 15 years old by his female teacher 25 years older and no one blinks an eye you know that the culture represented (ie secular) is one very sick culture. If it was a Catholic priest touching a 15 year old boy their rightly would be an outrage. He draws no attention because she is female (sorry feminist) I suspect. The agenda of our secularist is very very sick and unfortunately the children who are blessed enough to survive the womb have to put up with this sick social engineering or be bullied and labelled bigotted and other vile terms perverted by those pushing this agenda.

From the sublime to the ridiculous! Followed by a (ignorance personified) virtual diatribe of risible rubbish!

And giving little else need be said that would add anything positive or worthwhile to this debate, all that remains of note, is that this (flat earth) troglodyte runs true, to a long established, intractable, recalcitrant form! Of not allowing the now irrefutable scientific evidence to alter his verbose and oft times quite venomous, bully boy commentary!

The gender of sports people, or defence personnel, for that matter, is of little concern to those fair minded folk, who participate/also serve, just their ability, indomitable courage and form!
Alan B.

What is the difference between wanting something and having a right to it?

It seems the HRC decides that whatever minority sexualities want should be defined as a right. Even if it is a right how do we decide which rights should be acknowledged when there are competing rights?

In a democratic society we have as a principle that the majority should be favoured. Sexual minority’s themselves agree with this principle except it seems when it comes to their own rights. Either we give up this principle and accept the ensuing chaos or we stick to it and apply it to all situations where there are competing rights.

Sexual minorities have to accept that they are in a minority. This in no way de-values their sexuality. It is just a matter of fact. Other types of minority seem to accept this reality and can be reasonable about their rights.

What makes these people so repulsive is nothing to do with their sexuality and everything to do with their lack of adherence to basic principles of democracy which we all abide by.

The HRC mirrors this disdain for democratic principles which are in fact human rights. They are rights agreed to by all who live in a democracy.