The Forum > Article Comments > Are we really secular or pagan? > Comments
Are we really secular or pagan? : Comments
By Peter Sellick, published 12/4/2017The first thing to be said about this is that there is no such neutral sphere. The error of secularism is that it limits what it understands as being religion to identified belief systems.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Page 5
-
- All
Dear Yuyutsu,
.
You wrote :
« Perhaps the constitution never intended to protect religious freedoms … »
There is no doubt in my mind regarding the sincerity of the intention, Yuyutsu, but, as we all know, “the road to Hell is paved with good intentions”.
The guarantee of the Australian secular State, or should I say, the “intention” of the Australian secular State is defined in Article 18 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights which was ratified by Australia on 13 August 1980 and came into force on 13 November 1980 :
« 1. Everyone shall have the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. This right shall include freedom to have or to adopt a religion or belief of his choice, and freedom, either individually or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in worship, observance, practice and teaching.
2. No one shall be subject to coercion which would impair his freedom to have or to adopt a religion or belief of his choice.
3. Freedom to manifest one's religion or beliefs may be subject only to such limitations as are prescribed by law and are necessary to protect public safety, order, health, or morals or the fundamental rights and freedoms of others.
4. The States Parties to the present Covenant undertake to have respect for the liberty of parents and, when applicable, legal guardians to ensure the religious and moral education of their children in conformity with their own convictions »
.
I guess that’s about the best any secular State can do in terms of a guarantee and ensuring that it is respected by submitting any litigation to the decision of the country’s most competent, professional, High Court judges through the democratic process.
.
(Continued …)
.