The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > A special relationship? Addressing misogyny is not just about being prime minister > Comments

A special relationship? Addressing misogyny is not just about being prime minister : Comments

By Jocelynne Scutt, published 28/2/2017

The Prime Minister is reported to have said that the 'biggest statement' made when she 'sits down' with the President is she 'will be there as female prime minister.'

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. All
This article is confronting to the sensitivities of the male . More evidence of the left wing gravy train in free fall.

Go Donald!
Posted by diver dan, Tuesday, 28 February 2017 9:44:59 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
It's like the author's advertising she's 'not right in the head'.
Universities today are like huge mental asylums, and obviously she spent a lot of time there.
Posted by Armchair Critic, Tuesday, 28 February 2017 10:07:23 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
'Misogyny' is a word beloved of inadequate females who cannot cut the mustard on their own. Rather than blaming men for their short-comings, they should be studying the women who have made it in the cruel, hard world.
Posted by ttbn, Tuesday, 28 February 2017 10:15:34 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Your running first at the moment Armchair Critic, but very very close behind for second place is ttbn...
Posted by diver dan, Tuesday, 28 February 2017 11:11:33 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Jocelynne, rather than perpetuating the misandry that passes as academic works, & social engineering by the vested entities Machiavellian pursuits, let's ask ourselves (collectively) what all the Bra Burning, Wimmins Industry hype is all about ? Is it trying for equality as you purport, or is it seeking to have the whole system overthrown ?

Ironically, I recently read about the hero of the Domestic Violence Industry, Criminologist Dr Paul Wilson and his gaoling over child abuse. Having many years ago read his tome "The Other side of Rape" and several publications since, it did not surprise me in the least.

"Emails from Det-Sgt Heron to the women, who made complaints of being touched by Wilson when they were younger, were read to the Brisbane Magistrates Court.

In them Det-Sgt Heron labelled the women as brave and wonderful and said he and every police officer thought Wilson was guilty.

Mr Potts said that after the encouragement from Det-Sgt Heron the women changed their statements to add more detail and stronger allegations such as touching the breast instead of the shoulder.

Det-Sgt Heron said his conduct was not unusual and his role included supporting alleged victims.

He denied telling the women to collude with each other to make the case stronger."

I do not doubt for a moment that the experiences of Rosie Battye, the deaths of Tara Brown along innumerable girlfriends, wives and partners at the hands of men are made up, but what I do challenge is the way in which lesbian partners, & female's abuse of their male partners, husbands, boyfriends is so skewed and misrepresented in the statistics and via the common press aka Electronic Whorehouse...to what end ?
Posted by Albie Manton in Darwin, Tuesday, 28 February 2017 11:43:32 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
get over it Jocelynne. Hilary with her contempt for the deplorables and backing by true deplorables lost. You should be rejoicing that at least when the first woman is elected to the White House that it is not someone with emilys list sick ideology and deplorable attitude towards unborn girls. I know their human rights seem to matter little to 'human rights' lawyers. Yeah Trump is far from perfect but miles ahead of the swamp of elites that has filled Washington and judges post. What a breath of fresh air after Obama and his Israel hating policies. Also Obama was heading towards having genderless toilets/bathrooms etc. Surely that would be a threat to the feminist privilege you and others have managed to make a career out of.
Posted by runner, Tuesday, 28 February 2017 12:08:42 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
This is a sexist article that is universally repugnant to all those who be man and wife.
Posted by plantagenet, Tuesday, 28 February 2017 12:13:25 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Jocelynne, the tripe fed to us goes way back. Who foists this ideology upon us ? No surprise, it's the Feminazi's: See: http://www.wel.org.au/history and http://trove.nla.gov.au/people/615565?c=people

From a 1995 article titled: 'Pornography, academia, homosexuality and the promotion of paedophilia in Australia.'

"Australian columnist Beatrice Faust, writing in the Weekend Australian of 18-19 December 1993, indicates that advances have been made in Australia of what has become known as the International Academic Paedophile Movement. This term refers to professionals in Academia, the Media, Science, Government and other fields who are actively promoting adult/child sex by lobbying to remove age of consent laws, promoting the idea of early childhood sexual freedom and giving their imprimatur to the false notion that children are not harmed by sexual encounters, either homosexual or heterosexual, with adults."

"Former Director of Research for the Australian Institute of Criminology, Paul Wilson, in the Courier-Mail of 25 August 1990, had this to say about Clarence Osborne ..."His collection of material included hundreds of photos" and Wilson says "he had come to see me because of my reputation as a civil libertarian and because he was sure I would respect his rights to privacy."

Paul Wilson says sure, Osborne "was guilty of having homosexual relations with minors. But was he a monster...?" (Remember, sexually molesting over 2500 adolescent boys for 20 years and Wilson asks was he a monster?) [In] Another book by Wilson, 'The Man They Called a Monster' , [he]says that children should have the "right to sexual freedom" and advocates abolishing "any age of consent in sexual relations" and insists that given proper instruction "children should have the right to conduct their sexual lives with no more restrictions than adults...".

From:http://fernartz.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Beatrice-Faust-ebook.pdf

"There’s a lot of gender gap research that goes into just how women are different from men and how you can appeal to women and, in contrast, how you can get women to vote for particular politicians. Emily’s List, which is the ALP Women’s political support group, has a specific area where they do gender gap research."
Posted by Albie Manton in Darwin, Tuesday, 28 February 2017 1:57:04 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I'm starting to worry about Graham.

Where the hell do you go to dig up this garbage? Where ever you find it, that is a place to be avoided. It is obviously contaminated by something ugly.
Posted by Hasbeen, Tuesday, 28 February 2017 2:02:33 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
A comment on the "gender gap" if I may? The only 'gap' evident is the long standing gap between the ears of academics, politicians and their sycophants - the gap in which used to reside common sense and common decency...irrespective of gender, sexual orientation or political persuasion.

The management term, turned catch cry, of: "what ever it takes" seems to abrogate any one else's rights - implied, legal or perceived over everything else in order to achieve the [stated] mission.

From:https://meanjin.com.au/essays/at-war-with-ourselves/

"Australia’s culture wars are like a garden of rhizomatous weeds. Every incident is connected underground to other events, to ideas, to people, to institutions, to processes, as if by tendrils.

...From here the tendrils lead to Rupert Murdoch’s NewsCorp empire, with its deep connections to conservative politics in Britain and the United States, and its mastery of divisive populism via its British and Australian tabloids, and in the United States, Foxnews.

...Like the stories before it, whatever fleeting and sensationalist coverage that story attracts, it almost certainly won’t speak directly to how Australia’s long-running culture wars have distorted our politics and all the related processes of law, governance and journalism beyond all recognition.

You say asylum seeker, I say queue jumper; you say Indigenous rights, I say special privileges; you say global warming, I say conspiracy; you say gay marriage, I say unnatural; you say feminism, I say misandry; you say immigration, I say invasion; you say Islamophobia, I say terrorism."

What say you Jocelynne ...?
Posted by Albie Manton in Darwin, Tuesday, 28 February 2017 4:02:51 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy