Yes Alan B we can find stuff on YouTube about thorium. We can also find stuff on YouTube about how to get a current from a potato but I don't expect to see a spud led energy boom any time soon.

The Chinese are at the forefront of thorium research and they say that the earliest they'll have a demonstration plant will be 2024 with a commercial plant a decade after that. They also say there are still significant unresolved problems that may not be resolvable.

That you blithely choose to ignore the views of the clear leaders in this field is the victory of childish hope over sober evaluation.

Hasbeen, please tell us YOUR climate credentials, and maybe all the other climate scientists here can do the same.

<<"Ho hum."
Ho hum indeed JKJ.

"Having lost, and lost, and lost, and lost the argument over and over and over and over again,"

When?
Explain all the emission reduction schemes, renewable energy projects and research into same?
If we lost then why can I see so many wind turbines around?
Fail.

"the global warming hysterics want to re-enter the forum having made no attempt to bother to understand and engage in the real issues.

Fail."

Completely fail JKJ. No argument just a fallacious statement, no actually just a straight up lie. It is you and your ilk who refuse to even look at the science and facts. It is you deniers who dont bother to understand and engage.
Fail 2

"The same circular reasoning, the same appeal to authority, the same misrepresentation, the same non sequitur, the same ad hominem. Pathetic."

The same insulting non argument you always come up with. The same refusal to debate and just throw bile and lies at people.
Pathetic.
Fail 3

"Mere malevolent abuse of people who not only disagree with you, but have completely thrashed you intellectually and morally, is all you've got."

Couldnt have put it better myself. Cant believe your hypocrisy given the insults and abuse you already posted.
Fail 4

"If you want the issues to be resolved in your favour, you need to ADDRESS THE ISSUES you fool. Simple anecdotes about how your lawn is dry in summer at too stupid to be countenanced."

The same goes for you fools and your "but its snowing in the US" crap.
You rant on about ADDRESS THE ISSUES but where oh where JKJ is your ADDRESS OF THE ISSUES? Hey. Come on. Where? Show me?
Your post is just rudeness and insults and idiocy from a typical rightard hypocrite. Not a single mention of any science to back your position, not a single shred of evidence put forward. Nothing. Just insults.
TOTAL FAILURE.

How about you addressing some issues mikk?
I have asked constantly for a reference to science to support the assertion that human emissions have any measurable effect on climate.
Climate fraud supporters, like yourself, have not responded, because there is no such science, so there are no issues to address.
“Three Australasian researchers have shown that natural forces are the dominant influence on climate, in a study just published in the highly-regarded Journal of Geophysical Research. According to this study little or none of the late 20th century global warming and cooling can be attributed to human activity.”
http://climatedepot.com/a/2117/PeerReviewed-Study-Rocks-Climate-Debate-Nature-not-man-responsible-for-recent-global-warminglittle-or-none-of-late-20th-century-warming-and-cooling-can-be-attributed-to-humans

Author states -Dr Peter Schrader - is member of Doctors of Environment of Australia

I ask a simple question - what is his degrees that designates he be awarded the role of Dr?

I ask also (please excuse my ignorance on subject) - who make up the "alleged" members of the Doctors of the Environment of Australia?

mikk

I have repeatedly AND COMPLETELY disproved the global warming hysterics' case, or rather assumptions, for ANY climate policy in here by asking three questions.

I have posted them in here over and over and over and over and over again.

And each time, the warmists do not answer, just go quiet, slink off, and then later pop up somewhere else re-running the same belief system that they can't defend.

Just as you're doing now. Acting AS IF all those prior discussions never took place.

If you want to maintain that we face catastrophic man-made global warming that policy can improve at a worthwhile cost.

Merely assuming it, and assuming everyone must agree with you as a precondition of entering the discusion, and abusing anyone who disproves you, only shows you don't understand the first thing about science.

There is no such thing as science which must be taken on blind faith, and no such scientific term as "denialist" you stupid fool.

If you're serious, look up my questions that warmists have repeatedly and dishonestly evaded, and answer them. After all, according to you,
the fate of the planet turns on it.

But if you won't, why should I be bothered wasting time with your completely demolished, fallacious fraudulent abusive hysteria?

Answer my questions, turd.