"Your disregard for international law is disgraceful"

Hypocrisy at its finest. How many UN resolutions have Israel ignored, except one that suits them.

The West Bank settlements, including East Jerusalem are illegal under International Law, unless you're Israeli of course, who believe they are above International Law because they are Jewish.

Billyd

Don't parrot the mantra that Israeli settlements are illegal in international law

They are legal under article 6 of the Mandate for Palestine and article 80 of the UN Charter except where they have been built on privately owned land without the consent of the owner.

Rubbish, they are illegal, and all the bullcrap in the world won't change it, even your puppet masters the US admit they are illegal.

//You can now add law-breaker to your Jew-hater credentials in your CV.//

Yeah of course, Dave. Everyone who disagrees with Israel is necessarily anti-semitic. Even the Jewish ones.

And everybody who disagrees with your interpretations of international law is necessarily guilty of actually breaking international law.

Give it a rest, you old fool. You're making an ass of yourself.

#Billyd

The repetition of your meaningless mantra is meaningless.

Put up some facts man or butt out.

#Toni Lavis

I have claimed the UN Security Council has violated article 80 of its own Charter and is therefore in breach of international law.

I have stated in my article:
" The questionable legality of Resolution 2334 needs to be urgently resolved by the Security Council itself seeking an advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice ("ICJ") under article 96(a) of the United Nations Charter."

That is my opinion. Everyone is entitled to an opinion - especially when he provides the facts to support that opinion.

What do you find objectionable in that?

Let the UN Security Council get an advisory opinion and see who is right or wrong.

Catching up with David Singer's studied avoidance of the elephant in his racist room:

"Seems you are unconcerned that there are 57 Islamic States in the world of which 22 are Arab. Yet the world has had to put up with the world demanding another one for the last 100 years and rejecting offer after offer that has been made.

"Are these also "racist states of born overlords and submen"?

"Your vitriol is spared for the only Jewish state in the world that has been legally reconstituted as the Jewish National Home by the League of Nations on its biblical and ancestral homeland."

--

It was constituted (sort of) - not REconstituted - by a shonky edict written entirely by foreigners - an extension of a colonial "Declaration" from the long defunct British Empire. Palestinians have NEVER been even peripherally involved in decisions giving their homeland to foreign terrorists. The result is a lot more than a "Jewish National (sic) Home" it's a STATE with a blatantly race-based "Law of Return" clearly demarking born overlords to rule over submen on the basis of race. It exists only by massive annual payments and military and diplomatic support from the USA. When that dies, so does the State of Israel.

The Islamic States are ruled by a religious cult and not one of them has an open invitation to foreigners with the right bloodlines to settle there and displace the locals. Israel does - the world's only state based on racial overlordship. That's why it's picked out for hostility and its self-proclaimed right to exist and grab ever new territory. No other state like it anywhere in the world. Uniquely 100% racist in its laws and what serves as its "constitution"