The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Warped policy priorities and renewable energy > Comments

Warped policy priorities and renewable energy : Comments

By Erika Salmon, published 14/10/2016

Government interventions within the energy market to subsidise wind and solar have often caused more problems than they solved.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. Page 7
  9. 8
  10. 9
  11. 10
  12. All
Hi Shady Moocher,
I guess we can take it as read that you're just trolling and have no genuine courage in your convictions then.

Which was pretty obvious a long time ago to anybody paying attention.

I hope you have plenty of Super: IFM is pretty good. they've just invested $billions in buying ausgrid and plan to upgrade it in expectation of the boom in renewables over the next couple of decades. Of course, they're long term investors, you might be more comfortable with a shorter term solution. How about Shonky Super, who have an extensive portfolio of shares in some promising technology firms: Roughrider Sulkies, Fester and Stench Nightsoil Services, Holden Manufacturing, that sort of thing...
Posted by Craig Minns, Saturday, 22 October 2016 10:58:23 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Craig,

The 27% emission reduction target by 2030 will not necessarily threaten the network stability, and it does not take an Einstein to work out that there will be a major build of renewable energy generation between now and 2030, which is why IFM paid top dollar to buy Ausgrid who builds and essentially rents out its networks and who is set to get its snout deeply into the pockets of business and consumers. The question is whether the 16bn it paid will deliver the yields it expects.

If your definition of a troll is someone debates the issues based on facts, technology and economics, then that describes me.

My definition of a troll is someone that states their opinions as facts, lies, and when challenged resorts to ad hominems and abuse. This definition of a troll fits you like a glove.

From you online presence what appears to me is that you have no qualifications (probably didn't even finish school), ran a small business (and went bankrupt), and given your fierce defense of men convicted of domestic violence, were married and divorced with a fair chance of DV involved. You are trying to start a new life by getting a degree (and struggling) whilst living out of a rented room, and spending your spare time trolling.
Posted by Shadow Minister, Saturday, 22 October 2016 12:33:13 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Hi Slurry Muddler,
it's nice that you've taken an interest, but I'm afraid your detective work isn't as good as your imagination, so no bonus shares for you!

Never mind, nobody is holding a gun to your head to make you agree with anything. You're entirely free to do as you please, even if it does involve skulking around in the shadows with your hackles up like a dog that's expecting to be kicked.

You see, nothing you say or do is of any import in the reality of the economic necessity to move away from thermal power toward renewables. Adapt or die, it's your choice.
Posted by Craig Minns, Saturday, 22 October 2016 1:21:51 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Ouch, I must have really been on the mark. You really are a sad little man.

Perhaps you could enlighten me on "the economic necessity to move away from thermal power toward renewables" as there seems to be nothing written on it. Or perhaps you are just making it up again?
Posted by Shadow Minister, Sunday, 23 October 2016 5:12:41 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Well, of course, if it hasn't been invented somewhere else it can't be any good, can it?
Posted by Craig Minns, Sunday, 23 October 2016 8:08:13 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Soooooo, you just made it up. Do you just post whatever BS pops into your head?

Perhaps you have a one liner that fill a gap in Einstein's quantum theory work?
Posted by Shadow Minister, Sunday, 23 October 2016 9:45:26 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. Page 7
  9. 8
  10. 9
  11. 10
  12. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy