The Forum > Article Comments > People's Republic or a pure republic? > Comments
People's Republic or a pure republic? : Comments
By William Hill, published 23/8/2016The reformist leader of the post-Mao revolution understood that if the Chinese state was seen to capitulate to the Tianmen Square demonstrators the Communist Party of China’s (CCP) monopoly on power would inevitably be undermined.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Page 4
-
- All
The Colonial Office subsequently enshrined the principal of Aboriginal land rights by inserting in the Letters Patent, the document issued to the Colonization Commissioners early in 1836 to formally establish the colony of South Australia, a clause which recognized the prior rights of the Aborigines to the land and guaranteed that "any lands now actually occupied or enjoyed by [the] Natives' would not be alienated."
After protracted negotiations with the Colonial Office, the Colonization Commissioners agreed to the appointment of a Protector to safeguard the Aborigines' interests. Among his duties, the Protector was required to ensure that any land opened up for public sale had been voluntarily ceded and fairly purchased from the Aborigines. The Commissioners agreed to set aside 20% of the proceeds from all land sales in the colony to be used for the benefit of the Aborigines and also committed the South Australia Company to protecting "the natives in the unmolested exercise of their rights of property .."
Aboriginal Investment Properties and hunting estates entered an era of financial prosperity and excellent medical facilities on the extensive rural profit centres. The fine arts of music and opera flourished leading to the opening in 1849 of the Royal Aboriginal Conservatory for Theatrical and Symphonic Studies. Stud kangaroo and emu bloodstock earned top awards at Adelaide Livestock Society parades.