Suse,

I don't think that anyone, certainly not me, is suggesting that all domestic or other violent assaults are the result of drinking alcohol. Teetotallers are just as capable of violence as drinkers are. So are users of other drugs (alcohol is a drug). Use of any drug, including alcohol, causes permanent changes to the brain. Drinkers, in particular,are either unaware of this, or don't want to know. Therefore, an assailant who has a zero alcohol reading, may still do something he or she would not have done if they were not drinkers. Of course, their actions, as you suggest, might also be the product of innate personality problems, in which case, they should abstain from all drugs and stimulants.

I think it is wrong when a woman and children have to leave their home in fear
while the violent perpetrator gets to stay in the family home

I think at this point, the male should be billed by the government to
pay for the rented accomodation of the wife for the sake of some stability
and a decent temporary residence for the children or at least half the rent
if the wife has a job, but then she still has to pay hefty Childcare fees so she can
keep her job.

Why should the children be homeless, while the man sits there in a big
house with all the furniture and comforts around him.
Its a big thing for a woman to render herself and her children homeless.
Not an easy thing for any of us to do, man or woman to give up your home
To literally become homeless, immediately.

Very good article, Brenden O'Reilly. Especially that pertaining to the idea that domestic violence has become just another cause for the social worker caste, where they hope to expand their departments by promising to solve any social problem, if only the taxpayer will give them a blank cheque.

But I am disappointed in what you did not mention.

You should have pointed out that the Muslim suburb of Auburn was named by the Daily Telegraph newspaper as "the domestic violence capitol of Sydney." There is an obvious connection to violence towards women and the Islamic faith. Which is hardly surprising, when you realise that Islam is a paternalistic and violent religion which sanctifies male superiority, and sanctifies the use of violence towards women. Naturally, the Sisterhood gives Islam a free pass on this. Minorities with victim status with the socialist Left are judged by different standards.

So too, you could have mentioned that aboriginal women are murdered at a rate six times higher than their white sisters. Violence towards women has always been a recognised part of aboriginal culture. But once again, aborigines have victim status so.... "don't mention the war."

If the sisterhood want to prevent rising domestic violence, then banning Islamic immigration would be the right place to start, and it would not cost the taxpayer a penny. But saving the taxpayer money has never been what the socialist Left has ever been about.

Condemning aboriginal men for their extremely high rate of domestic violence is another no no. Once again, aboriginals are a protected species with the socialist Left, and their stone age culture is beyond reproach.

Better to just keep implying that those hated reprobates, white European males, are responsible for everything. And then say that the only way that domestic violence can be solved, is to give social workers lots of money, and then take the socialist path and make males and females absolutely equal in every way, by authoritarian decree.

Oh, and while we are on the subject, perhaps the Sisterhood could take attack our entertainment media for it's promotion of violence and it's denigration of family life?

Violent movies are specifically engineered to appeal to low staus young men, exactly the sorts of males most likely to emulate the on screen antics of the violent role model heroes. These "heroes" always use violence as a first resort to solving their personnel problems, and the only quality that all of them possess is the ability to beat the ever lovin' shiit out of anybody who crosses them. Such a quality is hardly an asset in family life.

So too, the execrable "rap" music "singers" routinely sprout songs sanctifying the use of violence towards women. Females are usually referred to as "hoes" or "bitches" and rap video's usually depict females as nothing more body parts that are the providers of sex and servitude. "Songs" by groups with charming names like "The Murderers", with charming "songs" entitled "Smack My Bitch Up", can be heard by every little boy listening to his radio in prime time.

But naturally, the Sisterhood has a case of acute myopia over that. Why? Well, to start with, this is the culture of black men, who are the victims of white male oppressors, that's why So as an oppressed minority, black males and their culture are beyond reproach. Of course, any fool can see a direct connection between the violent misogynist culture of black males and the results of that culture on black women. But the Sisterhood will never see around their ideological blinkers, and they hope that the rest of the population is too stupid to see past their propaganda.

Secondly, the entertainment media is absolutely infested with Lefties. Joe McCarthy was right. It is very uplifting wandering around pretending that you are a look-at-me do gooder who is the pinnacle of moral perfection, all you have to do is to ignore the fact that your own industry has all the morals of the tobacco industry, in selling a dangerous product to societies most immature and vulnerable.

LEGO That is telling it like it is, no PC BS. It is a pity that writers of these reports didn't grasp the nettle and do likewise.

David

Domestic violence has been around since the beginning of time, long before TV , gaming etc, and it occurs in all levels of society, in all countries, and amongst all races and religions.

So, there is no point trying to point the finger at any one group.
Violence occurs everywhere.
The main common denominator- human adult males.