The Forum > Article Comments > Could a 137 year-old equation explain the financial collapse? > Comments
Could a 137 year-old equation explain the financial collapse? : Comments
By Bryan Kavanagh, published 29/3/2016Aren't natural resources the passive element in the production process, upon which the active factors, labour and capital, operate to generate wealth?
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
- 2
-
- All
#1, A distinct lack of governing regulations, which in effect allowed the lowest forms of life and greed is good to foul share markets, which once were places that traded shares which when first introduced were just something to share the risk and subsequent returns.
#2 the concentration of too much of our finite wealth in too few hands. No hugely misrepresented mathematical equation is able to paint over any of that.
The only way to prevent history repeating itself is simple a better and fairer, more equitable wealth distribution between those who risk capital and those whose bent backs/racked brains create the all actual wealth!
As one might see in genuine cooperative enterprise.(share holding workers)
Of course there should be root and branch tax reform, rather than the hot air and fathomless talk and fiddling at the edges, that has replaced it; and absolutely counterproductive manic absolutism, just to shift liability for the have to the have nots, rather than introduce real reform.
We have a chance to turbo charge our economy, and just by the simple expediency of utilizing a massively under utilized multiplier factor and its handmaiden, resultant massively improved discretionary spending.
Just get real about tax reform, and introduce something that no multinational, [some with bigger budgets than sovereign nations,] can actually avoid, namely an entirely unavoidable stand alone expenditure tax, which just taxes all income equally at say a flat 19%.
And given that is done, return the averaged 7% of the bottom line that is ripped out by current tax compliance costs!
And take the 7% savings away from the 19% tax rate and hey presto, a real rate of just 12% tops, no ifs buts or maybes!
And indeed no reason to waste time better spent, fudge the books or hide income under the mattress.
Thinking within a fixed circle of ideas, limits the questions and indeed any and all possible solutions!
Indeed one needs to understand the problem and its causes before a viable solution can be worked out and implemented!
Rhrosty.