The Forum > Article Comments > Six points on Pell > Comments
Six points on Pell : Comments
By Xavier Symons, published 7/3/2016After reading the transcripts of Pell’s 19 ½ hours in the witness box, it strikes me there are several key issues that have not received sufficient attention.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
- 4
-
- All
"It would indeed be a massive coincidence if everyone in the Catholic Church was deceiving George Pell about the activities of pedophile priests," you say.
"Everyone in the Catholic Church"? A few billion people? Has that ever been suggested? No. Would it ever be suggested? No.
Pell was a junior priest at the time. As he rose through the ranks, he argued, individuals kept information from him: Bishop Mulkearns, Archbishop Little, people running the Catholic Education Office.
Why is Pell supposed to be solely responsible, decades later, for the fact that many, many other people in more senior positions in the Catholic hierarchy at the time failed to deal with the information they had AS A MATTER OF FACT in relation to pedophiles within the Catholic church?
I can hear the bells of bigotry ringing loud and clear.
Why would you not hold to account the parents, non-pedophile teachers, priests, nuns and others who knew about these sex crimes AS A MATTER OF FACT yet did nothing?
Those were different times. So what have you done to expose female genital mutilation lately?