The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Six points on Pell > Comments

Six points on Pell : Comments

By Xavier Symons, published 7/3/2016

After reading the transcripts of Pell’s 19 ½ hours in the witness box, it strikes me there are several key issues that have not received sufficient attention.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. All
Agronomist, get over yourself. Deal with the detail of the evidence, not your own posturing.

"It would indeed be a massive coincidence if everyone in the Catholic Church was deceiving George Pell about the activities of pedophile priests," you say.

"Everyone in the Catholic Church"? A few billion people? Has that ever been suggested? No. Would it ever be suggested? No.

Pell was a junior priest at the time. As he rose through the ranks, he argued, individuals kept information from him: Bishop Mulkearns, Archbishop Little, people running the Catholic Education Office.

Why is Pell supposed to be solely responsible, decades later, for the fact that many, many other people in more senior positions in the Catholic hierarchy at the time failed to deal with the information they had AS A MATTER OF FACT in relation to pedophiles within the Catholic church?

I can hear the bells of bigotry ringing loud and clear.

Why would you not hold to account the parents, non-pedophile teachers, priests, nuns and others who knew about these sex crimes AS A MATTER OF FACT yet did nothing?

Those were different times. So what have you done to expose female genital mutilation lately?
Posted by calwest, Monday, 7 March 2016 11:08:33 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Do you think he is a moral leader? You are the one doing the blaming?
If other people think he is a moral leader and he fails to act according to what they expect then isn't that an issue between Pell and his followers? What has his moral failures got to do with you since you do not even acknowledge his moral authority.

He may be guilty of covering up child abuse and that is a crime but his moral leadership is only of relevance to his moral followers.It is not a crime to fail your moral leadership.

The only thing most should be concerned about are his crimes.

It sounds like you are disappointed at his moral failure. Why should you be.
Posted by phanto, Monday, 7 March 2016 11:14:37 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Extraordinary the number of men who try to justify Pell's behaviour and support for many pedophiles in the catholic church.
Posted by MarilynS, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 2:20:06 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
"... the fact that many, many other people in more senior positions in the Catholic hierarchy at the time failed to deal with the information they had AS A MATTER OF FACT in relation to pedophiles within the Catholic church"

Posted by calwest, Monday, 7 March 11:08pm

Yes, the Catholic church is a wholy unethical organisation that fosters immorality among its people
.
Posted by McReal, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 9:03:00 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
MarilynS,

I've checked the posts again and I can't see one that attempts to "justify Pell's behaviour" nor any action on Pell's behalf which supported "many pedophiles in the catholic church".

So would you like to nominate examples?

One of the major problems with this issue is that bigots make wild generalisations to suit their own agendas, then act as though those generalised accusations were matters of fact. It's a convenient cover for pre-existing prejudice.

So be specific, please.

It is anhistorical to accuse Pell of actions (or lack of action) 40 years ago which were socially and culturally different from the way those actions are seen today. Pell has admitted that, in retrospect, he should have done more. But that's almost certainly not the way he or many others would have seen them at the time.

And one more question: why is it only George Pell who is being held accountable for what many others - Bishop Mulkearns, Archbishop Little, various people in the Catholic Education Office, police, parents - did or did not do to bring the relatively small number of pedophiles to justice? That is what smacks of bigotry.
Posted by calwest, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 9:14:27 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Very relevant item on A Current Affair tonight about Sarah Monahan's experience with Robert Hughes's child abuse 30 years ago on the set of Hey Dad.

Different world. Hughes was protected by station executives, parents and others. And police did nothing, even when offences were reported.

Hilarious, isn't it? Not. Congratulations to Sarah and the numerous other brave girls and young women who came forward to support the prosecution.

As several people, including Sarah Monahan, have made the point, the culture was very different back then. But, of course, that was only 30 years ago.

I'm looking forward to the explanations of how that was entirely George Pell's fault.
Posted by calwest, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 9:14:42 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy