The Forum > Article Comments > Freeing Julian Assange: the last chapter > Comments
Freeing Julian Assange: the last chapter : Comments
By John Pilger, published 5/2/2016The United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention has ruled that Julian Assange has been detained unlawfully by Britain and Sweden.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
-
- All
Posted by Foxy, Friday, 5 February 2016 3:16:34 PM
| |
So why didn't he front up to court and point all that out ? He would have been a genuine hero then.
And please don't come out with any paranoid rubbish about how can you trust the court, the Swedes are all working for the US and the CIA, the world is out to get him, etc. etc. Joe Posted by Loudmouth, Friday, 5 February 2016 3:38:52 PM
| |
Foxy the crime in Sweden as initiated by feminazis is that you "lied" to get the girl into bed! That is actually a crime in Sweden. He said they were the only one and he lied. In Sweden it is a crime. Argue with the Swedish sisterhood not anyone here.
Gee his old Mum was whining about her poor little darling on the radio today. What a joke! How old are you Jules? Grow a set for goodness sake. Posted by JBowyer, Friday, 5 February 2016 3:44:07 PM
| |
Julian Assange did not lie to get the women into
bed. They both initated the sex and have now admitted that they did that. The reason he did not go to Sweden is because he asked the Swedes to come to London. He was happy to answer their questions in London. He simply did not trust going to Sweden however he had no problem with London. The Swedes refused. Something's not right here. I wouldn't have trusted them either - especially now with the girls admitting what they did. And by the way Assange had told his full version when he was first accused. The Swedes used that against him. Google this for yourselves - it's on all the web. Why would you believe the women - people who invited him back to their homes a week after the supposed rape and had no problem sleeping with him. A man who supposedly had raped them? Pull the other leg! Posted by Foxy, Friday, 5 February 2016 4:26:49 PM
| |
"Why would you believe the women?"
A backflip of Olympic proportions, that is! A classic! Do you mean to say that women complainants might tell porkies and flex the truth? That Sweden's radical feminist inspired laws are unreasonable? That the police, prosecutor and State might be over-zealous where a man is concerned? Somehow the feminist mantras can be forgotten where a white haired favourite of leftists is the alleged offender. Maybe shoving a pallet load of pineapples up the derriere of Uncle Sam and 'authority' generally qualifies him for a 'get out of gaol free card' and even better statue above and beyond the law and courts. Imagine if it was a male sportsman instead. That would be a very different kettle of fish and he would have been gutted. It is a lay-down Misere that the apologists for Assange wouldn't be challenging Sweden's laws and justice administration and British law as well, if it wasn't affecting one their their own. In fact the very same feminists who complain of alleged regulatory and administrative overreach and unfairness in the case of Assange would have the same laws and interpretations in Australia if they could. That is hypocrisy. I count myself among the many ordinary citizens who object to the spin and want to see the facts come out. However, if he did not wear a condom as he was allegedly requested to do and if he mounted a woman while she was asleep, he deserves to have the law book thrown at him and several years gaol. Report by Marie Colvin, http://www.theaustralian.com.au/in-depth/wikileaks/wikileaks-founder-baffled-by-sex-assault-claims/story-fn775xjq-1225976459286 Posted by onthebeach, Friday, 5 February 2016 6:02:57 PM
| |
I don't know the facts associated with Julian ASSANGE'S self imposed stay in the Ecuadorian Embassy? But his actions in relation to his deliberate leaking of classified data belonging to other Nations to the world's press, stinks to me.
He appears to be a very obsequious, subservient sort of bastard who I wouldn't care to trust as far as I could throw him? He reminds me very much of those despicable informants and 'fizzes' that hang around coppers ready to give-up anyone where they think they can earn a buck or two? More often than not, these blokes usually end up face down in a storm water drain, with their mouth crammed full of human excrement, and their lips sewn tightly together - a classic sign of a 'lagger'! Hated by criminals, despised by police alike! Posted by o sung wu, Friday, 5 February 2016 7:12:02 PM
|
Both women have finally now admitted that the
sex was consensual. That Julian Assange was framed.
And that in each case the women even let Assange stay
an entire extra week in their homes sleeping with
him without any problems whatsoever.
http://www.snn.bz/assange-framed/