The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Saudi Arabia's act of strategic defiance > Comments

Saudi Arabia's act of strategic defiance : Comments

By Alon Ben-Meir, published 11/1/2016

The Saudis wanted to send a blatant and carefully calculated message that the Kingdom is capable of standing on its own, and it will not be deterred by either the already destabilized region or by the repercussions of its act.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All
The message Saudi Arabia is sending is that they are the main backers of ISIS and sectarian Islamic terror in general.
While the Royal family try to distance themselves the stench is still on them.
The west and in particular the USA is in full head in sand mode trying to defend Saudi Arabia and Turkey for that matter.
Posted by Cobber the hound, Monday, 11 January 2016 7:55:30 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I think the too rich and too powerful Saudis are sending an unmistakable strong man, I can do as you do message, that those in her region actually respect, hands off and thus far and no farther or else?
Rhrosty.
Posted by Rhrosty, Monday, 11 January 2016 9:50:12 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Alon, what a shame that you have not been Obama's adviser over the last several years. His lack of understanding of, and preference for disengagement from, the Middle East have contributed to a much more dangerous situation than seemed likely before his 2009 Cairo speech sold the pass.
Posted by Faustino, Monday, 11 January 2016 11:25:03 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Well, if they are so busy getting at each other they will have less
time to devote to getting at the "west".
Let them have a go, it will clear the air and hopefully impoverish them.
Saudi Arabia is now at the start of the downside of peak oil.
Iran would like to reimpose the Persian Empire on the middle east.
Egypt is fast becoming the very poor man of the Middle East.
All in all a very inflammable mix.
Posted by Bazz, Monday, 11 January 2016 1:55:57 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Hi Bazz,

Which is probably why Obama has been trying to maintain a balancing act since the Arab 'Spring', to keep the big players apart, their armies away from each other and their fingers off the nuclear button.

The three countries you mention, Saudi Arabia, Iran and Egypt, would all be at each others' throats with the slightest encouragement: they each represent the backward and brutal forces, respectively, of Sunni Islam, Shi'a Islam and secular tyranny.

So what options to the ordinary people, those caught in the middle, and underneath, all of that, have ? How can they avoid being ground into the dirt ? Flight does seem to be the only option.

But the difference between being a migrant and being a refugee is volition: migrants move willingly and are usually prepared to work their arses off, while refugees have usually moved unwillingly, and tend to have a sense of grievance, and even entitlement, wherever they go. Currently, those in Europe may have an inaccurate picture of Europe and their rights there: that they are entitled to whatever 'luxury' they see Europeans enjoying, and entitled to it now.

So an impossible situation is looming.

Joe
Posted by Loudmouth, Monday, 11 January 2016 3:35:51 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Hi Bazz and Joe

Methinks the author is overly US centric in perception and as an advocate of US actions.

As in Afghanistan http://intelnews.org/2016/01/08/01-1841/ the US is gradually dropping in power to influence Middle Eastern - Iranian affairs. At the same time Russia's less ambivalent stance means Russia is gaining in influence. China, being more dependent of Mid East/Iranian oil, is also a rising force behind the scenes.

It was China, after all, that supplied the Saudis with ballistic missiles http://gentleseas.blogspot.com.au/2012/08/saudi-ballistic-missiles-nuclear.html - something the US refused to do. The author ignores 2 decades of Saudi financial assistance to Pakistan's nuclear weapons program - with the Saudis expecting Pakistani warhead help when its needed.

The author needs to realise that international relations doesn't rely on the (in)activity of Obama-Kerry foreign polcy.

Regards

Pete
Posted by plantagenet, Monday, 11 January 2016 4:35:11 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy