The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Fitzimons versus the royalists > Comments

Fitzimons versus the royalists : Comments

By Everald Compton, published 23/10/2015

The indisputable fact is that two thirds of the Commonwealth of Nations (the old British Colonies) are Republics. Some have been so for 60 years and very few have the Union Jack on their flag.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. Page 5
  7. All
Poirot.

I have tried in vain for years on OLO to get you multicultural dhimmie-wits to answer the questions I have put to you. Now, Aalong comes Poirot with a Dorothy Dixer of her own. Now, I promise you, I will answer your question, when you answer mine.

And this topic is about multiculturalism. The abolishing of our historic links to Britain is all about suppressing our British heritage to create a brave new world of an Australia with a generic, no name brand of culture, One that might appeal to our immigrant population which seems to want to live with us while rejecting our British descended national identity.

Australia is not a multicultural country. It is a culturally divided country which is already displaying signs of serious social strife and separatism. We already have large areas of Australia where a racist aboriginal flag is flown instead of the Australian one. And parts of Sydney are becoming no go areas for Australians just as in France, Sweden, Holland and London. A few years ago in Sydney, a young Australian boy was murdered when he inadvertently turned his car into a Muslim controlled street in Bankstown, and had a piece of steel thrown through his windshield which penetrated in his head.

Turn away from the Dark Side, Poirot. Come back to your people. It may be very fashionable to always oppose the interests of your own people, and support their welfare dependent rapist and killer enemies, but there is a name for people who do that, and it is not a pretty one.
Posted by LEGO, Monday, 26 October 2015 4:52:56 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
By great good fortune, Australia became a constitutional monarchy, a political structure which serves us well, and which seamlessly incorporates our history and traditions.
Someone like Everald, who would need a course in constitutional history, before he could understand that, is the last person who should have the temerity to offer advice on the topic. Only a dunce would display his abject ignorance of history by writing “that the arrival of the First Fleet two and a quarter centuries ago was an occasion in which 30,000 indigenous people were slaughtered defending the land that was theirs for 50,000 years.”. He must have taken Pilger’s lies to be Australian history.
And he advises us to get behind a lefty clown like Fitzsimons to overturn an appropriate and workable system which has served us well since its inception.
Stop being an ignorant pest, Everald. You must be able to do something useful, like learn the history of your country, or learn to write correct English.
Phillip Howell, there was nothing about the dismissal of Googh that was not completely legal. There is no doubt about its legal validity.
Posted by Leo Lane, Friday, 30 October 2015 9:44:36 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. Page 5
  7. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy