'Fluke' is indeed a good example but it is not used to give respectability to unnatural sexual practices, it'd be a fluke if it did.

Again?

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/appeal-to-nature

I see homosexuality as a defect in nature...a bit like downs syndrome or any other congenital abnormality. At least with female homosexuality penetration is likely to involve the part of the body that exists for that purpose.

//I see homosexuality as a defect in nature...a bit like downs syndrome//

I see people who see people with Down's syndrome as defective as defective.

//At least with female homosexuality penetration is likely to involve the part of the body that exists for that purpose.//

The tongue? The tongue was designed for the purposes of tasting food, speech, blowing raspberries and licking stamps and envelopes. When it is used for sexual purposes that constitutes an unnatural perversion of its intended function.

Or maybe you mean the fingers? Fingers were designed for the purposes of fine-motor manipulation such as writing, sewing and playing musical instruments, for sign language and for making impolite gestures. When they are used for sexual purposes that constitutes an unnatural perversion of their intended function.

Cunnilingus is unnatural. Every time somebody eats pussy God kills a kitten.

Fingering is also unnatural. Every time somebody fingers somebody a fairy dies.

Toni,

Down's syndrome is a defect of nature therefor Down's syndrome people are defective in varying degree.

@Toni Lavis "I see people who see people with Down's syndrome as defective as defective." So you think an ad hominem wins the argument?

Regarding your tongue argument...at least its not found in the most grubbiest of holes.