The Forum > Article Comments > The environmental impact of creation > Comments
The environmental impact of creation : Comments
By Ian Plimer, published 20/4/2015At the court hearing, God was cross-examined and asked why He wanted to undertake this massive project, especially as it appeared that it was extremely unlikely that any social benefit would derive from His venture.
- Pages:
- ‹
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
- 4
- 5
- ›
- All
Posted by Rhian, Monday, 20 April 2015 3:57:58 PM
| |
I think it is hilarous that the same dishonest tactics that Ian used against creationist are now being used by the warmist religion against him.
Posted by runner, Monday, 20 April 2015 5:11:37 PM
| |
>The science supports the existence of evolution<
No it doesn't, it just supports the probability of adaptation compelled by change. And simply put, that single fact supports intelligent design! The entire theory of evolution is comletely dependent on a single celled organism erupting by pure change from, wait for it, a primordial soup for which there is no evidence; plus, a series of perfectly timed steps, which even then are reliant on the birth and death of countless stars, to in fact, create the carbon and the oxygen, we carbon life forms need as absolutes for our very survival. And for there to have been a primordial soup, we would have needed to find some nitrogenous coke deposits, particularly where there hasn't been the very convenient mantle folding, that allegedly destroyed any and all evidence of such a soup, if there ever was any. And some of those very convenient single celled organisms just refused to move with the evolutionary imperative and stubbornly refused to evolve, remaining single celled organisms to this very day. Instead of becoming bone cells, skin cells, brain cells, nerve cells, blood cells and so on, all cooperating magnificently, to create the thing that is as complex and intelligent as a human. And only needing alleged endless repetition to just create a single celled organism to begin with? Nothing that lives, lives without the life force, and regardless of the science, nothing but nothing science has discovered explains it or its creation. Nor countless out of body near death experiences or a young man awakening after a long term coma able, though never ever having been exposed to anything Chinese, to speak fluent Mandarin upon awakening. Evolutionary theory, founded on the non science of being able to create something from absolutely nothing! MAGIC! Given nothing begets nothing! At least I started from the premise of a junkyard, a whirlwind, magic and vastly better odds! Rhrosty. Posted by Rhrosty, Monday, 20 April 2015 6:31:41 PM
| |
What is amusing here is that conservation was originally a cause of the Right, not the Left, which was focused on jobs and human welfare. In the US for example, President Theodore Roosevelt, America's conservation president, was a Republican.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_movement_in_the_United_States The traditional Leftist attitude to Nature can be seen in the enormous environmental problems created by Communist governments in Eastern Europe. Posted by Divergence, Monday, 20 April 2015 8:14:41 PM
| |
Just for you, Rhosty, to get you up to speed on this:
http://www.dummies.com/how-to/content/what-evidence-supports-the-theory-of-evolution.html , and, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligent_design#Scientific_criticism Posted by Luciferase, Monday, 20 April 2015 9:04:03 PM
| |
About as funny as a fart in a lift.
A twisted attempt at denigration that fails on every level. Still having problems with logic poor prof. God, courts, greenies, politicians? WTF Capital cities, populations, Greenpeace etc that all exist BEFORE creation? Straw man arguments never work. Trying(failing) to disguise your abuse behind "humour" was the best you could do? I assume the godbotherers have no problem with blasphemy and laughing at god any more. I look forward to seeing many more god and religion jokes on OLO in the future. Here's one to start. Hitler walks up to the Pearly Gates and says to St Peter, "I'd like to come in." St Peter: "Not likely!" Hitler: I've repented and I've given back all the gold and treasures that I stole from the Jews, and I'm really sorry." At that point, Jesus walks up and asks what's going on. St Peter: "It's Hitler here, he wants to come in." Jesus: "Bugger off!" Hitler: "No, it's true! To prove it, I've got a six foot solid gold cross I can't find the owner of. I could give that to you." Now Jesus was partial to crosses, so he went to see God. Jesus: "Hey Dad, I've got Hitler outside and he wants to come in now he's repented." God: "Tell him to get lost!" Jesus: "But Dad, he's given back all the gold that he stole from the Jews - except for a six foot, solid gold cross he can't find the owner for. He says I can have it." God: "And what do you want with a solid gold cross? You couldn't even carry a wooden one!" Posted by mikk, Tuesday, 21 April 2015 9:31:29 AM
|
What "hate and invective" are you referring to? The article is merely poking fun, and the posters on this thread (so far) seem pretty restrained.