David Singer’s ingrained racism shows through yet again in his latest reply.

*The “Jewish National Home”, on land stolen in an orgy of brutal ethnic cleansing if the Pentateuch is to be believed, had no legitimacy then and was not able to be “reconstituted”

*There was not a single Palestinian or even Arab representative among the 51 states cobbled together by the British Empire into a “League of Nations” in the 1920s. The following colonial nations were represented (indeed dominated): Britain and its various fiefdoms, France, Belgium, Holland, Italy, Portugal, Spain. This bunch of foreigners dictated the allocation of the Ottoman territory, the homeland of those born to it. That’s the so-called “Mandate”.

*Jews were indeed a minority in the territory grandly given away by the colonialists in their fraudulent “Mandate” – and still are (not that that really matters as everyone born in the territory has a right to a place in it, as a legal equal to everyone else but not of course as an overlord).

The real Jews hate Singer's fascist Zionism. So let's not tar them all with a Singer brush.

#Emperor Julian

Telling one tenth of the story is typical of the misleading comments you consistently post.

The 51 member states of the League of Nations were:
Albania, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bolivia, Brazil, British India, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, El Salvador, Estonia, Finland, France, Greece, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Italy, Japan, Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes, Latvia, Liberia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Norway, Panama, Paraguay, Persia, Peru, Poland, Portugal, Republic of China, Romania, Siam, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Union of South Africa, United Kingdom, Uruguay, and Venezuela.

The "bunch of foreigners" (including Australia) - so demeaningly described by you - had suffered greatly in liberating the Arabs from 400 years of Ottoman rule

99.99% of the captured Ottoman Empire territory was set aside for Arab self determination and just 0.01% for Jewish self determination.

Yes - just 0.01% of the captured Ottoman territories "grandly given away" (as you misleadingly state) by the League of Nations for the Jews to legally "reconstitute" the Jewish National Home on the site of its ancient biblical and historical homeland.

The Arabs were represented at the Paris Peace Conference where these decisions were made - led by Emir Feisal with T.E. Lawrence there as interpreter.

Do you think they failed because they only got promises for 99.99% of the captured Ottoman territories and not 100%?

Those decisions resulted in the Mandates for Palestine, Syria and Lebanon, and Mesopotamia.

The Arab's refusal to accept these legally binding decisions continues to be the stumbling block to ending the Jewish-Arab conflict.

Trying to tear up 90 years of established international law has proved a recipe for one continuing Arab disaster after the next - including 1922,1937,1947,between 1948-1967, 1967,1970, 1973,2000/2001, 2005, 2007, 2008, 2012,2014. - the list is really endless.

For what? A piece of land one third the size of Tasmania and the elimination of all the Jews that live there.

Keep spewing your hate - but at least have the guts to tell the whole story - not some highly misleading and distorted concoction of your sick Jew-hating mind.

Well said, Arjay (Posted Tuesday, 4 November 2014 9:27:07 PM).
The question of the demographic breakdown in Israel/Palestine is somewhat open to interpretation. Are Jewish citizens of Israel currently not living there counted in the number of Jews, and are the Palestinians currently not living there counted in the number of Palestinians?
I do wonder why Israel throws a hissy fit when Palestine is recognised as a separate state. The alternative is one state ruled by one person/one vote. If that ever happens the numbers will have a story to tell.
South Africa showed the world how to manage that transition. The apartheid regime there was brave enough. Are the Zionists?

Israel will go the way of the crusader city states and for the same reason. They weren't sustainable and neither is Israel. When the money dries up from outside, especially US sources, they will wither and be over run. It won't be pretty but they have taught their opponents well.

DKit

Singer you have no credibility at all when you quote "international law" and anything to do with the UN. Considering the number of "international laws" israel disregards and the number of times it has completely ignored UN directives and resolutions it is just laughable.
israel is the worlds worst offender against "international law" and human rights and everyone knows it. We have seen it over and over again.

Stick to justifying your filthy treatment of your neighbors by your racist god and his murderous aims for his "children". At least it is more honest and avoids the need for all your slippery weaselness singer.

Sweden, as usual, leads the way but dont worry singer it is only the beginning. Many more countries will recognise the Palestinians and place sanctions on israel. The violence and oppression has become too blatant and too extreme. You only have yourselves to blame israel.

The end is nigh for the zionist invaders and the sad, repetitive bleatings of singer and his ilk will go the way of the Dodo.
Unlike Ikea, which will undoubtedly last longer than the idiotic, murderous, godbothering, theocracy called israel.
Well done Sweden.