The Forum > Article Comments > How did Magna Carta survive and is it relevant today? > Comments
How did Magna Carta survive and is it relevant today? : Comments
By Barry York, published 18/9/2014Resistance to usurped or tyrannical authority is an essential component of the rule of law formally recognised as such since the Magna Carta.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
-
- All
Posted by Rhrosty, Sunday, 21 September 2014 10:31:01 AM
|
And worthless if we're ever ruled by elected (born to rule) dictators/power hungry petty tyrants/corporate psychos!
This is simply not good enough your Honor!
And allows those with conferred authority to behave as if we had no actual rights/withdraw those we have now on mere caprice or whim?
Yes sure, we can apply to the courts, for an injunction or a measure of protection, and that generally means those with the most real rights, "civil liberties" are those with the most money, and able to afford $600.00 an hour silks, let alone appeal courts and the usually prohibitively expensive high court!
Hell, we have pensioners/domestics/hospitality workers, who don't even earn that much in a week/40 hours!
The only real right the common herd actually posses, is the right to elect our representatives, and we would do far better with far fewer lawyers, who seem to look after their own rather than the common herd?
And of course they and the courts, who allegedly uphold our "civil liberties", don't want that particular gravy train unwound!
Hence the self evident resistance to an irrevocable bill of rights by lawyers, particularly those handed the greatest parliamentary power!?
Civil rights need to be just that and automatically applicable, rather than only actually applied or real, if one can afford to engage a lawyer/legal firm!
Nobody should spend even so much as an hour with their civil liberties suspended, by unlawful incarceration, or be effectively silenced, or unable to assemble.
If you can't assemble/speak your mind, what follows that?
The rejection of unions, protest marches, various religious activities/religions.
They wouldn't do any of that would they? Well?
Trust us, we're politicians, dedicated to serve the electors, and not vested interest or self!
ICAC anyone?
Rhrosty.