The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > The right to speak freely, or the need to be heard? > Comments

The right to speak freely, or the need to be heard? : Comments

By Rob Cover, published 6/5/2014

Was the interruption of last night's Q&A justified on the basis of a right to be heard? Is this a justification for Section 18C?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. 8
  10. All
A magnificent student protest, Passy?
Bovine excreta!
What is magnificent about hijacking a huge audience's news information source with prepared banners and reheased conformist chants?
The broadcast was being conducted on private corporate property with the right of any member of that audience to participate under simple rules of procedure.
This group of noisy children just didn't understand the process by which the right of free speech is enjoyed.
What they did was to alienate viewers who now will be more probably likely to approve whatever repressive action the federal government may take on university funding in the forthcoming budget.
Posted by Ponder, Tuesday, 6 May 2014 10:01:22 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Ha, ha, ha; passy takes the piss; look at the link, "More Brains not warplanes".

Nary a brain present in the left and the socialists on display last night on Jones' follies. They're against fascists; yeah well, let's see them go down to the nearest mosque and jump up and down there.

What a bunch of cowards, hypocrites and bludgers.
Posted by cohenite, Tuesday, 6 May 2014 10:10:22 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Really cohenhite, you should be more precise in your language. What was cowardly about the protest? What was hypocritical about it? And how can you call them bludgers without having a clue about their circumstances? There are valid criticisms that can be made bout the protest, no need to resort to inanity.
Posted by Candide, Tuesday, 6 May 2014 10:20:51 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Well as someone who believes in the right to free speech, even were that offends, I thought that the students had a right to voice their opinion, but were not granted a right to hijack the debate!
Their message was heard loud and clear, and even aroused a little supportive hand clapping, long before it stopped!
Henry Lawson might have said, when he was being very polite, a trifle overdone!
However, given the length of the performance, it turned from a reasonable protest into an extremely rude and overlong interruption that simply denied any others their right to speak freely or even exercise the right of reply!
And in that context, killed any support previously engendered!
My kids went to uni, but had to drop out due to associated accommodation costs, which are always higher for kids from the country!
So its not the tuition fees per se that are the problem for many, just the additional accommodation costs, city central rents, electricity, and the occasional oddball you're forced to share with; most city kids simply don't have to pay, or endure; given they're still at home sponging off the oldies?
It also seriously shortened Q+A, leaving many with their right to also speak freely, gagged by the stunt; with the obdurate length, crowding out the message and any sympathy for their cause or point!?
Reasonable people would have made their point, then shut up, while they were still ahead!
Freedom of speech includes the right of reply, a right these "simple" tail wagging the dog folks, just denied everybody else!
They weren't on the street or in a public place, but rather, at a private meeting, where people are essentially invited!
And simply didn't have a right to hijack the program!
At the end of the day, they effectively denied other speakers the common courtesy of being able to reply, or just speak, given they completely drowned out the person who was then speaking, just as you might expect from I want, I want, me, me, spoiled brats with no manners!
Not at all impressed!
Rhrosty.
Posted by Rhrosty, Tuesday, 6 May 2014 10:31:11 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Rob Cover, those offended by Andrew Bolt could have easily been "heard" by suing him for defamation.

They didn't do that.

Jay Of Melbourne, yes all these help-the-vulnerable-minority laws and policies reek of White elitism.

Those poor wretches just can't get anywhere on their own, we need to give them a hand.

Ponder, yes people like this never think that the louder they yell, the more likely they will turn people off.
Not by what they say, but the *way* they say it.

Back to Activism For Beginners class, kids.
Posted by Shockadelic, Tuesday, 6 May 2014 10:32:36 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
@Passy,

<<What a magnificent student protest...Get used to it... This is what democracy looks like>>

It was an example of Lefty bully boy/girl tactics.

I'll bet that if a mob of Nazis closed down the discussion in similar fashion Passy wouldnt be saying: "Get used to it... This is what democracy looks like"

Heaven help us if Passy & co every get power!
Posted by SPQR, Tuesday, 6 May 2014 10:48:12 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. 8
  10. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy