Ludwig,

PART II -

It is extremely low and unethical not to mention above all with regards to our concerns here for the culture of the education institution which has been hijacked by the elitists group aligned with Leftists. This type of method to get your message or opinions across especially in an environment where people are supposed to be able to argue against Anything is a disease to freedom.


Why this type of method of "brainwashing" (essentially) young future leaders so as to influence or control or completely hijack them is destroying the unique and extremely advanced achievement of the ability to develop people who have full critical analysis and freedom of thought.

The further danger sinister in nature of how these Leftist bully opinions as methodologies [i.e. brainwashing techniques] is that they redefine words and important terms and definitions of concepts for example with concepts like "racist" or "discrimination" they twist to redefine to be defining only the thing they want to target (like ONLY white westerners can be racist etc.).

Worse than is how they include as a widespread claim so that all people who consider themselves free and open thinkers will likely think in them they have found a home as the Leftist group tends to draw in the adolescent and otherwise shallow and vein minds by offering them an automated perpetual showering of claims that by mere virtue of being accepting of the Leftist agenda they become "intelligent", "free thinker", "open minded", human rights activist" and "anti-racist" also an "educated critical thinker".

This is likely why the majority of high school kids today have already been indoctrinate like this and so when they get to uni any semblance of their own raw potential and true curious and critical nature of mind has likely already been paved over and cemented on.

Thus by uni they likely are already an avid proponent of common leftist beliefs and opinions.

Ludwig,

PART III -

But the reason why I feel that all this becomes so important to my goal and desire to eradicate all oppressive and deceitful/immoral entities in society is because it is as a primary tool or weapon in that very Leftist propaganda methods which is leading to the creation of a community and culture who all have the same ideas and desires (Leftist) which is of the exclusive Leftist design, which they will use to further influence the systems and cultures by further hijacking other institutions and similarly planting subversions.

To go back to my original point that small elitist self-interest power groups hijack specific institutions for their own group's narrow and selfish interests. In the education/Leftist example I would say that the only way such a strong presence of the Leftist force could easily enter and hijack the entire Arts departments is if already sufficient critical mass of Leftist control top positions already. Thus my claims of hijacking again show true as it seems the smallish elitist wealthy-type Anglo-group who are the Leftists have hijacked these institutions and have completely destroyed much of t=what is vital and essential to education and replaced it with propaganda which then runs continuously to turn out more and more faithfuls.

However it seems to me clear that these small elitist self-important Leftists have made their own beliefs about things down to even right and wrong to be the standard as accepted in these places of "learning", and if that is not a clear case of hijacking then I don't know what is.

I hope I did not go too much into silly vague details you might not agree with.

Yet I do hope that some of what I have said is taken to be what I simply and directly mean it to be. If not I am happy to further discuss.

Ludwig,

My method for realistically attempting reform would start with a course which would present to the class numerous topics which contain challenging problems of freedom and equality and discrimination.

Example - Situation where group A and a group T have some altercations and disagreements both groups claim to racism from the other side.

Question to class: How can we determine what is what in an essential moral sense in the scenario given involving Group A and Group T?

Obviously the answer will be hard to bring forth and many might even claim that without the real world "baggage" so we can understand context etc. we cannot hope to make judgements here.

But I note this bare and naked content-less story to be especially of note since I believe that whilst the full context loaded story would with fully clear and unbiased, un-pressed minds perhaps lead to a fair and more complete judgement, yet I also note the vital factor these baggage contexts plays in role of normal supposed critical thinking and judgements in destroying their balance and true form.

At least with my method it could perhaps be for the very first time the average Leftist influenced student can and does actually makes a moral judgement and decision about how to decide which group if any, 1 or both are responsible for the racism and the racial violence, without only and in all cases flocking as an automaton to the predicted answer to fit with Leftist beliefs.

To show the force of the possibility of this method - let us ask each student to explain what they decide and why and later tell them Group A was an Anglo group from Sydney and Group T was a Somalian teen group T from Sydney.

With that in mind have the class inspect and attempt to understand why if any discrepancies are found to exist in this type of judgment making as compared to their natural real life process.

It is my strong belief that a course designed in that way could serve some towards this reform I hope.

Wow. Thanks Jottiikii. That’s a hooter of a reply!

Reforming education institutions, and cultural and entertainment arenas, all has much merit. But it would be very difficult, and even with our best efforts it would be a long time before we saw any real changes in terms of the various forms of equality across our society.

My take on inequality comes from an entirely different perspective:

I think that there is something far more urgent. This is involves the issues that I involve myself with most prominently on OLO – population growth and sustainability.

We need to head towards a paradigm of sustainability. As a fundamental prerequisite, we need to wind immigration right back progressively to net zero, so that our population growth will be reduced by about two thirds and will be due entirely to births. This will then slowly but steadily reduce of its own accord over about the next three or four decades until we reach a stable population.

We surely MUST strive for a situation where our life-support systems can meet our needs, very comfortably and with a big safety margin.

continued

If we just continue on as we are, with very high population growth, and a national budget which can’t keep up even the basic services and infrastructure without us going ever-further into debt, highly stressed water supply capability in many cities, towns and agricultural areas, a declining mining boom, an agricultural capacity that is not expanding while the domestic demand for food and the demand for export income for food is rapidly expanding, etc, etc, then INEQUALITY IS GOING TO GREATLY INCREASE!

The rich will get richer and the poor poorer. Unemployment will increase. Newstart allowance with decline or become much harder to get. The old-age pension will decline further, as will various other pensions and allowances.

This massive and manic pursuance of growth is intimately connected to the power that big-business has over government. They give big donations, which effectively buy the policies they want. This results in the rich and powerful getting ever richer, while the rest of us will get progressively poorer, and in a very unequal manner.

Governments are basically powerless to do anything about it! It is political suicide to even try to do the most rudimentary things towards changing this situation.

The lack of independence of government, and the resultant massively antisustainable path that our country is on, is absolutely a recipe for a major escalation in inequality.

This is by far the most important issue pertaining to inequality in this country.

LANGUAGE OF DISCONTENT
MEET POWER OF The people
http://rss.infowars.com/20140414_Mon_Alex.mp3

WE STAND TOGETHER
OR DALL ONE BY ONE ALONE
[WHEN THE CHIPS ..CAME DOWN/WHEN THE DICE ROLLED
THEY COULDNT SHOOT US/ LET thiS give yOU hope.
http://rss.infowars.com/20140414_Mon_Alex.mp3

A KEY POINT IN HISTRY
AND NO ONE TOLD ya the wwar is over
WHAT REALLY HAPPEND
http://whatreallyhappened.com/node