I can’t believe this confected distraction by the chicken-little brigade. How terrible for you Poirot, you must be traumatised. Do they have grief counsellors for alarmists?

Graham doesn’t defend me, nor should he.

I get accused of abuse when I ridicule the arguments put forward to justify AGW. People take that personally because AGW is a belief.

I have never complained about anyone nor sought to censor. I find these complaints by you and the others to be tried and tested means used by lefties to get their way. Everywhere we look we see people bullied and bludgeoned into submission about AGW.

Why don’t you criticise the science I put forward instead of linking to SKS and making languid, superior retorts? And,just to be precise which are you objecting to: my antagonism towards AGW or the manner in which I express that antagonism?

Anyway in regard to me calling Steele porno man as I said I recollected that was a character’s name in the Movie Boogie Nights. I have just checked and no main character was called that so whether it was mentioned in passing in the movie or I have confused SteeleRedux with other sources such as these I can’t say without siting down and watching the movie again; why don’t you watch it and report back Poirot:

http://steeleinlove.com/grapplingredux.html

http://steeleinlove.com/sensitivesteeleredux.html

And incidentally just once I would like from you precious types one compelling bit of evidence by way of rebuttal. Despite Agro promising much I haven’t had one since Bugsy took up cudgels when I was commenting on the article about the Knoor paper and the AF:

http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=14581&page=0

Where did Bugsy go; he really pushed me on that subject?

As a matter of interest Poirot do you think porno man, in the context above, is a more serious insult then denier with its Nazi and Holocaust connotations?

Warmair, I agree England’s wind analysis is for a very small area. But his is modelled accelerated wind; what assumptions has he used to justify the modelled acceleration in this small area?

And of course the scarlet Poriot finds she has to continue to read olo and returns to infect us with a little more of her venom.

Oh gosh, everyone's off sooking. Poor dears.

Here's an idea. Just one of the alarmists, agro, steel, ozdoc, Poirot etc, write their article about how AGW is right, put up some evidence and put themselves out there. How about that, instead of whinging about how rude I am, put out some evidence, a couple of graphs, some pictures, put me in my place.

So, let's see if they want to do that.

Have already - published in real science journals.

Not wasting any more time with you on an opinion site.

Ozdoc

Given your judgements in relation to witless and cohenite I'd love to critique those article you have published.

Can you please reference them or link them?

Yes Ozdoc, you've been such a stern critic of my comments; I think we deserve to see what you've published. Has it been on climate and if not, what area of science?