The Forum > Article Comments > Trans Pacific larceny > Comments
Trans Pacific larceny : Comments
By Jonathan J. Ariel, published 30/12/2013One of the world's most important trade deals you've never heard of is being negotiated between 12 Pacific Rim countries, including Australia. But you wouldn't know it, from all the attention it's not been getting.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
- 4
-
- All
Posted by Shadow Minister, Tuesday, 31 December 2013 7:41:02 AM
| |
According to the government's website :
" Australia's decision to participate in the TPP in 2008 followed an extensive public consultation process. Overall, there was widespread interest in and support for Australia's participation in the TPP. Input received through the consultation process is being used to inform the Government's priorities and objectives for Australia's ongoing work on the TPP." Now, you would think that you would remember that extensive public consultation wouldn't you ? Posted by wantok, Wednesday, 1 January 2014 7:00:50 PM
| |
Yes Wantok, it is very true, they only say there was consultation.
I would like to see someone with access to ask when and where was the consultation ? I would suggest that they asked everybody in the Minister's office. This is typical as I indicated in an earlier post on this thread that very serious matters are agreed upon by treaty and goes through the parliament in the middle of the night. There is nothing more certain that one or other of our banks will get into serious financial trouble. Where are you going to hide your money before the Financial Stability Board comes for your money ? The active hiding of the ABIRE's report 117 only got out because a journalist in Paris downloaded it during the night our time before the PMs office saw it the next morning and panicked. This is typical of what is happening in government. I had hoped the new government would be different but it looks like the Financial Stability Board will go ahead in Brisbane this month at the G20. Labour signed us up for it, and the Libs look like confirming it. Posted by Bazz, Thursday, 2 January 2014 8:40:06 AM
| |
Hi Bazz and Wantok
If you want info from the Government as to the state of TPP negotiations the relevant Minister is: The Hon Andrew Robb AO MP, Minister Trade and Investment His Office Phone is: (02) 6277 7420 Just call and provide a Comment on this thread regarding how you went - especially if his office staffers try to flick you to the DFAT address already mentioned. The info above was on the open Internet at http://trademinister.gov.au/releases/2013/ar_mr_131211.html Another handy holiday public consultation suggestion. Pete Posted by plantagenet, Thursday, 2 January 2014 8:58:25 AM
| |
Plantagenet, I have actually read part of the draft that someone had
accessed but it was unreadable. By making reference to other documents and to unreleased parts of the draft it was meaningless. Also it needs someone who has experience in decyphering the bureaucratese. Of more immediate interest and haven't they been quiet about the G20 this month in Brisbane approving and appointing the Financial Stability Board. They will then be ready to seize YOUR money if your bank gets into financial trouble so the bank can pay its creditors. I have read the documents setting up the board and as an IMF/G20 document it is easy to read and understand. GOOGLE produces a number of references to the FSB. Posted by Bazz, Thursday, 2 January 2014 10:14:02 AM
| |
Hi Bazz
I agree its hard to get a handle on the TPP and our Government's approach to the ongoing negotiations is a disservice to Australians. I can't claim to understand the financial system-banking changes involved with the TPP. One crack of light in the intentionally opaque process occurred in Nov 2013 concerned patents and our PBS medications scheme http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/medicine-prices-could-rise-under-transpacific-partnership-deal-20131113-2xh0r.html: "Australians are likely to face price rises for their medicines in coming years if intellectual property proposals contained in the Trans-Pacific Partnership agreement go ahead. The leaked treaty reveals a range of measures that would enhance the ability of drug companies to extend and widen patents on drugs." Looks like the public will have to continue to rely on leaks... Pete Posted by plantagenet, Friday, 3 January 2014 8:51:49 AM
|
The document so far thus only includes items that the US wants on the agenda with none of the compromises, deletions or concessions that a negotiated document would include, and unsurprisingly is biased towards the US. It is also extremely unlikely to bear much resemblance to the final document if it ever gets up.