The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Law against racial vilification steeped in Australian history > Comments

Law against racial vilification steeped in Australian history : Comments

By Peter Wertheim, published 20/12/2013

Fanny Reading's case against Smith's Weekly resonated with many of the kinds of issues that provoke debate in contemporary Australia – refugee children, terrorism, conflicts in the Middle East.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 21
  7. 22
  8. 23
  9. Page 24
  10. All
For someone who was allegedly taken out-of-context, you sure aren’t in much of a hurry to answer my requests for clarification.

You know what I think? I think it was actually you who was trying to take me out-of-context and it no longer worked after I re-worded what I said to mean exactly the same thing. Every step of the way you have tried to pull the wool over my eyes and it hasn’t worked yet, so what makes you think it’s going to work any time soon?

I see you have tried the ‘contradiction’ claim once again; probably in the hope that your audience are no longer reading because the “One quarter back” option now needs to be selected to view this thread. I’ve never seen that trick work before. You do realise there are email alerts that can be set up too, don’t you?

<<...only to have you denying that position in the next post with no clarification as to what your position was.>>

Oh, I clarified alright: http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=15856#276059

<<The best example of which was where you openly admitted that you understood that genetics and crime are linked … your next post had you hopping around in red faced apoplexy about my use of the word "concede".>>

What I said:
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=15856&page=0#275038
Your misrepresentation:
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=15856&page=0#275058
My clarification:
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=15856&page=0#275085
Your second crack at it:
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=15856&page=0#275189
My clarification:
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=15856&page=0#275229
Your further misrepresentation:
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=15856&page=0#275247
My clarification:
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=15856&page=0#275300

CTRL+F is your friend.

<<Making contradictory statements is either proof of a disordered mind, or a intelligent but dishonest one.>>

I have demonstrated your allegations of contradiction to be false three times already (http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=15856#275085).

Finally, you continue to refer to me as a youth with “sunshine” and “little bugger”, despite the fact that I have already clarified my (approximate) age, but you missed it in all your skimming. My clarification was in two posts that conclusively proved that it has actually been you, not I, who has been engaging in trickery and deceit (http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=15856#276001, http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=15856#276002).

You continue to make a fool of yourself every step of the way, LEGO, and it's all your own doing.
Posted by AJ Philips, Monday, 20 January 2014 10:00:30 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 21
  7. 22
  8. 23
  9. Page 24
  10. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy