The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Blasphemy laws unreasonably infringe freedom of speech > Comments

Blasphemy laws unreasonably infringe freedom of speech : Comments

By Ralph Seccombe, published 12/12/2013

The common-law prohibition of blasphemy is an anachronism, dormant since the nineteenth century but still on the books as a threat.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Page 4
  6. All
Very informative article.

It's alarming that, in a liberal democracy, in the 21st century this question still is a subject of debate, blasphemy laws are are violation of free speech and inimical to liberty.
As usual a problem is the 'useful idiots' like Burnside and Keneally who are deluded into thinking that in supporting the Moslem theocratic agenda they are protecting their own pet ideologies, the reality is that the Islamic crocodile will just eat them last.

I really envy the Americans with their constitutional protection for free speech.
Posted by mac, Friday, 13 December 2013 9:41:58 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Quote:
Yassmin Abdel-Magied pointed out that freedom of speech is established
by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, though when an insult
was aimed to incite hatred, it moved out of the realm of free speech.

Everyone seems to have missed that the Islamic countries rejected the
United Nations Declaration on Human Rights.
They cooked up their own version known as the Cairo Declaration of
Human Rights.

Basically it is anti democratic and imposes sharia law instead.
Posted by Bazz, Sunday, 15 December 2013 12:48:39 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
When it comes to blasphemy, I think God is quite capable of looking after him/her/itself.
If the laws are to be brought back then perhaps the tradition of stoning should also be re-introduced as a fitting punishment.

The term is really about how it offends the personal beliefs of others and is entirely in the "eye of the beholder".

What is seen as mere criticism by some becomes a horrendous crime by others but without a first-hand complainant, it's an example of a victimless crime.

Yuyutsu,

Most atheists use their reason, science and rational thinking in the service of explaining the universe, while religious people use the same for justifying their beliefs and prejudices.
Another difference is that arguments and evidence that don't support such beliefs are conveniently ignored or deliberately distorted to fit.
Posted by wobbles, Sunday, 15 December 2013 7:23:21 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Dear Wobbles,

Woe unto those who require evidence to support their belief.

Why would anyone want to explain the universe unless they assigned importance to it? Religion tells us to set aside the illusory universe and its temptations. If belief in God's existence helps one to resist the world - well and good; but when that same belief causes one to look for God inside the world, then they are fools whose belief in God's existence lead them away from God.

As for ignoring inconvenient evidence, that is the norm in every university.
Posted by Yuyutsu, Sunday, 15 December 2013 8:55:01 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Page 4
  6. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy