The Forum > Article Comments > Adoption is coloured by the past > Comments
Adoption is coloured by the past : Comments
By Debbie Garratt, published 12/11/2013Our view of adoption hinges on the wrongs we know about from the past, even though today's practices are quite different.
- Pages:
-
- 1
-
- All
- Pages:
-
- 1
-
- All
“The Reformer is always right about what's wrong. However, he's often wrong about what is right.” G.K. Chesterton .
It's fair to say we basically suffer under now reactionary 1960,70's politics - or failing late-stage Baby Boomer legacy preservation, in economic terms - generational theft of wealth and resources (they have killed their competition in the womb). The children that survived the womb are largely deprived of the conceptual tools and thinking abilities with which they might be able to challenge their rulers.
I'm sorry to say they are out of ideas, and feel threatened enough as in Tasmania,to attempt to criminalise conscientious opposition to abortion or demonise opposition to their attempt to abolish marriage. They've been reduced to mere clan based politics - massive increase in ameleriotion bureaucracies, the scouring of society with their paid up lawyers and journalists to find further pretexts for central government control (biggest lobby group in society) of social life.
A flourishing adopting culture doesn't fit well with their commitment to abortion, we must understand they will never be brought to see the ocean of baby blood they have presided over.
I discovered today Tanya Plibersek member of the brutal abortion lobby EMILYS List is married to Michael Coutts-Trotter, director-general of the NSW Department of Family and Community Services. So the little ones and their prospective parents are facing an uphill battle. (Plibersek is more interested in exporting abortion (family planning[sic]) around the world with taxpayers money than real compassion).
Thank you to Debbie for her truly life giving public service, for giving Australians hope to rally around.