SPQR

you only have to watch the ABC to see that white males unless in another minority group have very little chance of a job.

Malcolm 'Paddy' King "Divergence, I could swear we’ve had this conversation before."

Well stop writing the same article over and over again!

"Then through taxes and of purchasing goods and services, makes a similar contribution to the economy as you or I do."

So, basically the same economic benefit would occur with more *native-born* citizens (solutions: retain potential emigrants, train unemployed, raise retirement age, encourage births), or with White immigrants only.
Economic analysis still doesn't justify multicultural/multiracial policy.

"You want to run a tape measure up and down immigrants as if economic worth was somehow representative of a human life."

It's the pro-pops who view human lives as interchangeable units. Who cares *who* they are, as long as GDP benefits.

"aged care, cleaners, taxi drivers"

And White Australians did all those jobs and everything else not so long ago.
If there is less representation now, it's because there is excess competition and few "barriers to entry".

"Yes, job creation is slow but that is because of global recessionary forces."

So why doesn't immigration "slow" in equal measure?
When the stock market crashed, why didn't the immigration quotas "crash" too?

Malcolm Cheryl paddy King;
I see that my comment has spurred you into the "ad hominem" mode after being exposed for the shill that you are.
So be it, I will continue to expose you while you keep on repeating your propaganda.
Even Goebels had to stop in the end and what an end.

God, this discussion is so infantile.

As Malcolm points out, birth rates in developed countries (including Australia) are at or below replacement rate already. Food production has doubled in forty years.

But let's get to the nub of this racist attack on no-whites. Africa is four or five times bigger than Australia and, apart from the Sahara and parts of the north-east, is undeveloped. It has half a dozen of the biggest rivers in the world. Agriculture is mostly hand-worked without irrigation. [You can see where I'm going with this ? Quick, marshall your opposition !]

IF only 10 % of the arable land in Africa was irrigated from the Nile or the Congo or the Niger or the Zambezi or the Limpopo, massive rivers, say a million square kilometres, that would increase the world's food productive areas enormously. It probably won't happen by next week, but soon enough.

Why do developed countries have a zero or negative replacement rate ? Partly because women are grasping education and employment opportunities and either not having kids, postponing their family creation, or having far fewer kids.

Yes, of course, ideologies such as Catholicism and Islam demand that women stay more or less barefoot and pregnant, so there is a bit of work to be done there in overturning those reactionary belief-systems and freeing up women. No, that won't happen by next week either.

And one thing you can say about the Chinese in Africa, they are putting in infrastructure. Perhaps for their own ends of course, but if sub-Saharan African countries could overcome the corruption and incompetence of their governments, and develop productive infrastructure: dams, irrigation and electricity-generation systems, road, rail and port infrastructure, it's pretty obvious that they could feed the world.

So there's the agenda: educate women, invest in infrastructure and bingo ! Massive food production ! AND reduced birth-rates.

[TBC]

[continued]

Yes, it may take a century, in which time the population of Africa may triple - horrors ! All those Black people ! - but sooner or later, it has to happen. The current under-population of Africa could become just part of history.

And the racist notion of over-population will thankfully be a distant memory.

People create, people have ingenuity, they work, they are not just a burden, as they may seem to be for publicly-funded professionals in non-productive inner-city coffee shops, sipping their soy-lattes.

Joe
www.firstsources.info

Loudmouth "God, this discussion is so infantile."

So is posting almost identical articles every 8 weeks.

"birth rates in developed countries (including Australia) are at or below replacement rate already."

Which is cancelled out by mass immigration.

"But let's get to the nub of this racist attack on no-whites."

Whose race is being "attacked"?
Is Africa or Asia being radically transformed by alien immigration?

"Africa is ... undeveloped."

And why is that?
Could it be the character of the people who live there?

Europeans colonised all of Africa and most of Asia, yet development barely happened.
Surely, it would have benefited their empires to fully exploit those resources.

But in places where the Europeans established significant populations (North America, Australasia) you now see "very high development".

It's not the place, it's the people, that determine whether potentialities are achieved.

"Why do developed countries have a zero or negative replacement rate?"

Because immigration has pushed housing prices so high, two incomes are essential.
Feminism has also demonised motherhood for several generations of girls.
Concern over an uncertain future, whether conscious or not, will also make people reluctant to have children.

"ideologies such as" White guilt, multiculturalism and political correctness will keep Whites metaphorically "barefoot and pregnant", always having their needs and wants made subservient to alien peoples and utopian agendas.

"the population of Africa may triple - horrors ! All those Black people !"

Who cares, if they're in Africa.
That's not my concern.

"And the racist notion of over-population will thankfully be a distant memory."

So will people with red hair and green eyes.
If we keep being "inclusive" for much longer.