Hi Shockadelic,

Actually, I can look up Wikipedia too, it's amazing what you find there.

For example, yes, there is a phenomenon called 'outbreeding depression' and there is also one called 'inbreeding depression'. Take your pick.

All humans share the same basic DNA, there is no ill-effects from the inter-mixing of anyone from one population with anyone from another. Not an issue.

Of course people associate with other people from their own groups, but also as time passes, and especially through the media of school and work, with people from other groups as well. This sounds like a conversation from the fifties !

And on the whole, the children of immigrants are statistically more likely to attend university than us Skips. Perhaps you would like to complain about wogs taking 'our' university places ?

"relatively fewer workers" for the growing number of older people needing to be financially supported. 'Relatively". Do you understand the concept ?

I'm happy with any democratic approach, particularly one which encourages mixing. I'm happy and confident that our politicians and courts will never recognise something as backward and reactionary as Shari'a - unless the Greens someday capture government, that is. But that seems less likely with each passing day.

Nice talking to you.

Cheers :)

Joe
www.firstsources.info

What a shame you can't *read* Wikipedia.

The referenced topic is about breeding *within* a species.
Having "human" DNA isn't the issue.

No, you don't want "inbreeding" either, but that requires a very close, direct relationship, not simply the same general "type".

A Dutch man breeding with his Dutch sister = Inbreeding depression.
Breeding with unrelated Dutch woman = Hybrid vigor.
Breeding with other Germanic woman = Hybrid vigor.
Breeding with non-Germanic European woman = Hybrid vigor.
Breeding with other non-European Caucasoid = Hybrid vigor/Outbreeding depression.
Breeding with Mongoloid/Negroid = Outbreeding depression.

You don't want too close or too distant a strain.

Hybrids are unpredictable.
That's why breeders keep original "pure" samples on hand.
And they don't breed hybrids with hybrids and expect superstars.

If mixing produced greatness, the Middle East (historically centrally located) would be world leaders in art, science, philosophy.
Instead they spend more time bombing hijacked planes than any other people.

Brazil has been mixing European, Negroid and Mongoloid (Native Americans) for centuries with average results.

There isn't just the issue of genetic incompatibilites, but cultural ones too.

Cultural memes are like genetic alleles.
They'll *compete* for "expression" and dominance.
They can't all just co-exist harmoniously.

There is no "human" history, only the history of particular peoples and their respective cultures.

We shouldn't have to compete with memes or genes *imposed* on us from outside our own history.
We have the right to exist as a *distinct* people.

Minorities are possibly overrepresented in university (and some occupations) due to the impact of anti-discrimination law and internal bias to "progressive" ideology.

Who's going to reject the coloured applicant and face a potential lawsuit?
Reject the White applicant? No problem.

Yes, I understand "relatively".
And I say it's irrelevant.
Wealth is not generated by head count (Echo?).

There'll be *no* human labour in the future.
Robots, computers and machines will do all "labour".
Economic models based on paid human labour will be ridiculously redundant.
That day isn't too far away.

We should be planning for that future, not propping up a fading system with ring-ins in equally antiquated headwear.