Willem "Just try switching out the race label from your argument."

Why? If, as you admit "race" and "culture" are virtually interchangeable, why is "culture" preferable and "race" taboo?

There are still going to be conundrums either way.
Hungarians are White, but not linguistically related. Do we include them?
Iranians are linguistically related, but not otherwise culturally related.
Many Koreans are Christian, but not otherwise culturally European.
Basque are European, but a cultural isolate.

Due to colonialism, people of many races speak European languages and converted to Christianity, yet their native culture is still a principal influence.
How do we classify such people by "cultural" definitions *only*?

With White immigration, no matter what the cultural origin, our genetic demographics don't change.
With non-Whites, even if they totally assimilate culturally, they change our genetics.

Why should we have to change genetically?
Why are there no "human rights" for genetic types? Why no concern for endangered alleles?

Those changes cannot be reversed.
If we lose red hair or green eyes, they are gone FOREVER.