The Forum > Article Comments > Kerry commits 'harakerry' over Palestine > Comments
Kerry commits 'harakerry' over Palestine : Comments
By David Singer, published 31/7/2013Abbas, the western-backed parasite, has clung like dried excrement to power.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
- 4
- 5
-
- All
Posted by EmperorJulian, Thursday, 1 August 2013 7:40:36 PM
| |
David Singer,
"Answer: Because Israel is the Jewish National home legally sanctioned by the unanimous approval of all member states of the League of Nations under the Mandate for Palestine in 1922 and preserved to this day by article 80 of the UN Charter." So a group of European imperialists, in collaboration with Zionists decided how the Arab lands would be allocated. What was the result of the Arab vote on the proposal, or the of Palestinians, the inhabitants of the area coveted by the Zionists? Apparently they voted for annihilation....of course they're Arabs, they're all the same, they can move to other Arab countries. Why the sudden respect for the UN, Israel is notorious for ignoring UN resolutions. Why didn't the Roma, those forgotten victims of the Nazis get a homeland? Posted by mac, Thursday, 1 August 2013 9:51:38 PM
| |
#To mac
You state: "So a group of European imperialists, in collaboration with Zionists decided how the Arab lands would be allocated. What was the result of the Arab vote on the proposal, or the of Palestinians, the inhabitants of the area coveted by the Zionists?" Your statement is factually inaccurate for the following reasons: 1. Your claim that the land was Arab land is incorrect. It was Ottoman land and had been so for the previous 400 years until conquered by the Allied Powers in World War 1 and allocated 99.99% to the Arabs and 0.01% to the Jews 2. There was no identified group called "Palestinians". The Arab residents of Palestine were included among "the existing non-Jewish communities" which included people other than Arabs then living in Palestine. 3. The Arabs were consulted and initially agreed to this allocation of territory. Their greed later consumed their commonsense 4. The allocation of 0.01% of the Ottoman lands for the reconstitution of the Jewish National Home was unanimously approved by every member of the League of Nations Albania, Argentina, Australia,Austria, Belgium, Bolivia, Brazil, British India, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, El Salvador, Estonia, Finland, France, Greece, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras,Italy, Japan, Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes, Latvia, Liberia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Norway, Panama, Paraguay, Persia, Peru, Poland, Portugal,Republic of China, Romania, Siam, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Union of South Africa, United Kingdom, Uruguay, and Venezuela. Note your bete-noire America was not even a member of the League at that time. You then state: "Why the sudden respect for the UN, Israel is notorious for ignoring UN resolutions" Name one UN binding resolution that Israel has breached. That is what counts. You then ask: "Why didn't the Roma, those forgotten victims of the Nazis get a homeland?" If they had one - they probably have never claimed it. The Kurds do - and they have been denied self determination by Syria,Iraq,Turkey and Iran. Your Jew-hatred is sure eating you up big time. Posted by david singer, Friday, 2 August 2013 1:59:06 PM
| |
David Singer,
1. Sophistry. There were Arabs living in what is now Israel, the Ottoman Empire was a multi-ethnic multi-religious state, ruled by an ethnic Turkish elite, the Ottomans. 2. The inhabitants of Palestine, whether they were called Arabs or Palestinians had homes, families, land and heritage, all that was destroyed by the Zionists. 3 The "Arabs were consulted", nonsense, they were not. What happened, in fact, is that the imperialist powers selected corrupt, puppet tribal leaders to 'represent' the Palestinians--the entire squalid process is described in Chapter 9 of Eugene Rogan's book, "The Arabs-A History". 4. Why is that decision of the UN sacrosanct, the Zionists usually treat the UN with contempt, no legal hair-splitting allowed. http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/study-israel-leads-in-ignoring-security-council-resolutions-1.31971 "Your Jew-hatred is sure eating you up big time."--you still haven't accepted my challenge to provide examples. So far you've demonstrated you anti-Arab racism, that's unsurprising as Zionism is a racist ideology, the Terra Nullius claim in relation to Palestine is deeply racist. Posted by mac, Friday, 2 August 2013 3:45:52 PM
| |
#To Mac
1. Zionism is a movement espoused by an overwhelming majority of Jews and a large number of Christians that support the right of the Jewish people to reconstitute the.Jewish National Home in their ancient and biblical homeland. 2. That entitlement was given binding legal standing by the unanimous decision of all member states of the League of Nations. 3. The Peel Commission in 1937 reaffirmed that entitlement. 4. The United Nations Charter in article 80 confirmed that entitlement. 5. The United Nations in 1947 confirmed that entitlement. 6. The United Nations has reversed it's earlier decision that Zionism is racism. If you are not prepared to accept xll of these above statements then in my opinion you are a Jew -hater. I don't expect everyone to love Jews. You have an entitlement to hate Jews if you wish. Don't stand on your high horse and pretend not to be what you are.. Do you support the right of the Jewish people to have their own State in their ancient and biblical homeland as affirmed by the above decisions? A one word response - "Yes" or "No" will suffice. Posted by david singer, Saturday, 3 August 2013 9:14:11 AM
| |
"I don't expect everyone to love Jews," says Singer in a rare moment of honesty.
Why should we given what they do to the Palestinians and have done since 1948? I don't think that Jews are capable of love. Their religion gets in the road. Their god is loveless and punitive and so are they! Posted by David G, Saturday, 3 August 2013 10:14:07 AM
|
--
He's right. Racist Israel is more than an abomination in the Middle East, it is a threat to the 7bn people it considers not to be racially "special". Us. All the more reason to stop keeping it alive, and to target it with overwhelming nuclear might if it retaliates against civilisation for refusing to back its play. The Zionists may be blinded by their belief that God will protect them. Nobody and nothing will.