The Forum > Article Comments > Gillard's legacy > Comments
Gillard's legacy : Comments
By Patrick Baume, published 3/7/2013We are only seven days from her political demise, but many pundits seem to already agree that the achievements of Prime Minister Julia Gillard will seem more impressive with greater distance.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
-
- All
It would be as well to suspend judgment until the results of the Victorian police investigation into the AWU scandal is completed. Should the lady in question be charged as solicitor to both Bruce Wilson and the AWU, then we must wait further for the decision of the courts.
Posted by anti-green, Wednesday, 3 July 2013 3:47:30 PM
| |
The history writtten by labour barnacles in the leftist dominated media will rate Julia a better PM than Chifley.
Real historians will be objective and will colour their history with the written and oral contemperatenous commentaries of her peers. And that won't be at all flattering. Posted by imajulianutter, Wednesday, 3 July 2013 4:11:47 PM
| |
It will indeed be interesting to see how history
will judge Julia Gillard. The historian can establish that an act took place on a certain day, but this, by historical standards constitutes only chronology. The moment that the historian begins to look critically at circumstances, context, or any other considerations, the product becomes unacceptable for one or another camp of readers. Interesting times ahead. http://www.theage.com.au/comment/how-the-pms-gender-took-over-the-agenda-20130624-2oson.html http://voicelessvictim.wordpress.com/2013/06/27/julia-gillards-legacy-lives-on-in-historic-royal-commission/ One can only wonder whether Mr Abbott would have had the courage to initiate the Royal Commission into child sexual abuse in institutional settings due to his close religious affiliations, especially with Cardinal Pell? The former PM did take this responsibility - and that's quite a legacy in itself. Posted by Lexi, Wednesday, 3 July 2013 4:34:18 PM
| |
The real question is whether Gillard did anything that couldn't or wouldn't have been done by any halfway competent person in the same position. You don't get points for doing the obvious. But you DO lose points for NOT doing the obvious -- like holding a Republic referendum, legalising gay marriage and holding off on a carbon tax until there was actual evidence that it would do anyone any good whatsoever.
Posted by Jon J, Wednesday, 3 July 2013 5:41:41 PM
| |
The irony is that Gillard actually did govern well - good cabinet process and consultation, and a well managed minority government that delivered on important reforms: but lousy communications and let down by her media advisers. Rudd is an egomaniac, can't govern for nuts but somehow connects with the community. Go figure. Hopefully history will teat Julia Gillard kindly and fairly.
Posted by Beejayel, Wednesday, 3 July 2013 9:50:32 PM
| |
her legacy was being stabbed by the sisterhood after serving less than a term. Says more about the sisterhood than anything else. Very few principles but much rhetoric about their superiority. Hopefully the Liberals will promote on ability rather than the failed quota system.
Posted by runner, Wednesday, 3 July 2013 10:58:28 PM
|